1994
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.40.3.320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Periodic Review, Production Planning Model with Uncertain Capacity and Uncertain Demand—Optimality of Extended Myopic Policies

Abstract: Increasing product complexity, manufacturing environment complexity and an increased emphasis on product quality are all factors leading to uncertainties in production processes. These uncertainties are in the form of unplanned machine maintenance, varying production yields and rework, among others. In planning for production, an adequate model must incorporate these uncertainties into the representation of the production process. This paper treats the aggregate planning problem for a single product with rand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
210
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
210
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that such quantity hedging, i.e., "over" ordering, never occurs in a single-supplier random-capacity model (Ciarallo et al 1994). Quantity hedging protects the firm against capacity shortfall in the event that the other supplier experiences a capacity shortage and hence quantity hedging is valuable only when there are multiple suppliers.…”
Section: Dual Sourcingmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that such quantity hedging, i.e., "over" ordering, never occurs in a single-supplier random-capacity model (Ciarallo et al 1994). Quantity hedging protects the firm against capacity shortfall in the event that the other supplier experiences a capacity shortage and hence quantity hedging is valuable only when there are multiple suppliers.…”
Section: Dual Sourcingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This literature models reliability in three different but related ways: random capacity, e.g., Ciarallo et al (1994), Erdem (1999), random yield, e.g., Gerchak and Parlar (1990), Parlar and Wang (1993), Anupindi and Akella (1993), Agrawal and Nahmias (1997), Swaminathan andShanthikumar (1999), Federgruen andYang (2007a), and random disruption, e.g., Parlar and Perry (1996), Gürler and Parlar (1997), Tomlin (2006), Babich et al (2007). Financial default is another element of supply risk and has recently been explored by Babich et al (2007) and Swinney and Netessine (2008).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies in this vein include Glasserman (1996), Glasserman andTayur (1994, 1997), Kapuscinski and Tayur (1998), and Tayur (1992). Ciarallo et al (1994) considered random capacity. They found the optimal policy to be still of the base-stock type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies in this vein include Tayur (1994, 1995), Kapuscinski andTayur (1998), andTayur (1992). Ciarallo et al (1994) considered a random, and yet still independent, capacity stream. They found the optimal policy to be still of the base-stock type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%