A personalist approach to business ethics: New perspectives for virtue ethics and servant leadership

Abstract

This article has a twofold purpose: first, it explores how Leonardo Polo's personalist anthropology enriches and enhances neo‐Aristotelian virtue ethics and second, it highlights how this specific personalist approach brings new perspectives to servant leadership. The recently revived neo‐Aristotelian virtue ethics tradition finds that MacIntyre's scholarship significantly contributes to virtue ethics in business—particularly his conception of practices, institutions, and internal/external goods. However, we argue that some of his latest insights about the virtues of acknowledged dependence and human vulnerability remain underdeveloped because of the underlying anthropology that neo‐Aristotelian virtue ethics relies on. To overcome this limitation, we introduce Polo's transcendental anthropology as a possible foundation of a personalist approach that enriches virtue ethics. To do so, we address how transcendental anthropology can enrich two central aspects of virtue ethics, namely (1) the understanding of human beings and their flourishing and (2) the relationship of virtue to praxis and human work. Finally, to address the practical implications for business leadership and work that can derive from assuming transcendental anthropology, we address how servant leadership acquires a new perspective in light of this personalism and its logic of gift, highlighting interpersonal self‐giving as a way of service.

The Business Paradox: Exploring the interaction between the Business Clock and the Sustainable Development Goals through an ethical, sustainable and well-being prism

“…(1,16,17) La ética no solo se manifiesta a nivel personal, sino que está presente en los grupos y en la ética empresarial, también conocida como ética de los negocios. (18) Su influencia se extiende al capital intelectual y a la responsabilidad social. (19) y se aplica en todos los campos de acción, ya sea de manera positiva o negativa, dependiendo de si se aplican valores éticos o antivalores.…”

Theoretical Insights and Parents’ Views about Family-School Collaboration for Character Education in Latvia

“…The philosophical background of this paper lays on virtue ethics, even if it can be argued that virtue ethics may be complemented with other approaches to moral growth in order to account for the richness of the persons' moral development (e. g., Scalzo et al, 2022). In a virtue ethics approach, character is defined as "a set of personal traits or dispositions that produce specific moral emotions, inform motivation and guide conduct", and "character education includes all explicit and implicit educational activities that help young people develop positive personal strengths called virtues" (The Jubilee Centre, 2017, p. 2; for an introduction about the key ideas, practices and concepts that are shaping character education in schools today, see Watts et al, 2021).…”