2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2016.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Personality Matching-Aided Approach for Supervisor Recommendation (Research-in-Progress)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al [6] presented a Research Analytics Framework for Education (RAF-E), this being a student centric method for finding and recommending supervisors for new postgraduate students, considering different metrics from 3 dimensions: relevance, connectivity, and quality. Zhang et al [7] proposed a personality-matching aided approach for supervisor recommendation based on their previous work [6], which integrates objective measurements (relevance, connectivity, and quality) and subjective personality matching, to get a list of supervisors to recommend.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhang et al [6] presented a Research Analytics Framework for Education (RAF-E), this being a student centric method for finding and recommending supervisors for new postgraduate students, considering different metrics from 3 dimensions: relevance, connectivity, and quality. Zhang et al [7] proposed a personality-matching aided approach for supervisor recommendation based on their previous work [6], which integrates objective measurements (relevance, connectivity, and quality) and subjective personality matching, to get a list of supervisors to recommend.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some existing works utilize a combination of both subjective and objective measures of different criteria but also have missed important aspects, such as the professor's collaboration network, and do not utilize important details about other potentially relevant criteria, such as citations of papers, recent publications, and research grant details (grant amount, duration, role, etc.) [6] [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%