2014
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia

Abstract: Objective On July 1, 2012 Australia launched a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) designed around the needs of consumers. Using a distributed model and leveraging key component national eHealth infrastructure, the PCEHR is designed to enable sharing of any health information about a patient with them and any other health practitioner involved in their care to whom the patient allows access. This paper discusses the consumer-facing part of the program. Method Design of the system was through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
60
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A PHR will be integrated with an EMR and data from tele-health services in order to satisfy the 4P characteristics (preventive, predictive, participatory, and personalized) of the next generation of medical care service [30,31].…”
Section: Future Plansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A PHR will be integrated with an EMR and data from tele-health services in order to satisfy the 4P characteristics (preventive, predictive, participatory, and personalized) of the next generation of medical care service [30,31].…”
Section: Future Plansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The personally controlled EHR is a platform for patients to engage in their own health care [34]. Nevertheless, there are some issues of privacy restriction and patients' control over their information, such that currently personally controlled EHR adoption rates are rising in addition to the general EHR [50].…”
Section: Insertmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t M a n u s c r i p t [34] -Australia designed to allow more active participation on the part of patients and thus increase rates of implementation. Most general practitioners use this system, but patients are free to choose to use it or not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,59 It has possibly improved trust, 60 patient involvement in the clinical decision-making process, and in the quality of communication experience. 61,62 Disparities in access to computers and information systems have been termed the 'digital divide'. 31 However, health literacy is also an important component of being able to use online resources, 47 and technology may enable new forms of clinician-patient interaction.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%