2018
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Perspective and a New Integrated Computational Strategy for Skin Sensitization Assessment

Abstract: Traditionally, the skin sensitization potential of chemicals has been assessed using animal models. Due to growing ethical, political, and financial concerns, sustainable alternatives to animal testing need to be developed. As publicly available skin sensitization data continues to grow, computational approaches, such as alert-based systems, read-across, and QSAR models, are expected to reduce or replace animal testing for the prediction of human skin sensitization potential. Herein, we discuss current computa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As dermal contact is one of the ways of exposure to phthalates, we have computed their skin permeation coefficients using the SwissADME tool [51] and predicted their skin sensitization potentials using the PredSkin tool [52,53]. The values of the skin permeation coefficients are revealed in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As dermal contact is one of the ways of exposure to phthalates, we have computed their skin permeation coefficients using the SwissADME tool [51] and predicted their skin sensitization potentials using the PredSkin tool [52,53]. The values of the skin permeation coefficients are revealed in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study concerns the application of the following computational tools to envisage the possible biological effects on humans of the most commonly used phthalates: (i) the FAFDrugs4 tool [49] for producing the ADME-Tox profiles; (ii) admetSAR [50] and SwissADME [51] for envisaging pharmacokinetic profiles [50]; (iii) Pred-Skin for predicting skin sensitization [52,53]; (iv) ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOME for predicting endocrine disruption potential [54]; (v) Pred-hERG for predicting the inhibitory potential against hERGK+ channel [56]; (v) ToxTree for predicting toxicity class, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity [57]; and (vii) SwissDock [58] to assess the interactions of the cytochromes P450 (CYP) involved in xenobiotics metabolism (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP2D6) with phthalates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent times, there has been an increased interest in using more advanced statistical modeling techniques and sophisticated chemical descriptors, as well as leveraging the wealth of sensitization data available from multiple different in vivo and in vitro sensitization models. The Pred‐skin method utilizes multiple Naive Bayes models along with Dragon 2D chemical descriptors to generate individual assay predictions and a consensus skin sensitization prediction. The global model has a correct classification rate of between 70% to 80% for a two‐class system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is equivalent to the concordance between different experimental approaches. We refer readers to three recent reviews that discuss the current state of the art in QSAR modeling, read‐across, and rule‐based prediction for skin sensitization data …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%