2020
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2019.2951510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A PFC Based EV Battery Charger Using a Bridgeless Isolated SEPIC Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is done by adding the small-signal perturbation to the input currents and voltages, output currents and voltages, and the duty cycle. Using ( 27), ( 28), (31), and small-signal approximation (perturbation is symbolized byˆ), the small-signal model of one module in Figure 12 is…”
Section: Intermediate Capacitor Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is done by adding the small-signal perturbation to the input currents and voltages, output currents and voltages, and the duty cycle. Using ( 27), ( 28), (31), and small-signal approximation (perturbation is symbolized byˆ), the small-signal model of one module in Figure 12 is…”
Section: Intermediate Capacitor Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topology is suitable for low powers, and it employs a large number of components. In [31], bridge-less (BL) SEPIC PFC rectifiers have been proposed to reduce conduction losses, but no isolation is provided. Moreover, a bulky input inductor is required for filtering the input current harmonics, contributing to the system's size and copper losses.…”
Section: Doicmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boost topology and its derivatives are the most used topologies for the PFC [11][12] [13][14][15] [16][17] [18]. Other topologies such as buck-boost [19], Ćuk [20], SEPIC [21], and other stepdown converter [22] are also be used. We found that the IWJ topology is also suitable for the PFC stage, for the reason that its conversion ratio covers from some value to infinity, which provides the ability to convert the pulsating input voltage to a regulated constant output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has practical limitations such as high inrush current and unsatisfactory current handling capability under over load conditions [11]. To overcome these issues, the bridgeless SEPIC converter was introduced in the literature [11][12][13][14]. The bridgeless SEPIC converter offers many prominent merits such as limiting inrush current at startup and overloading conditions, reduced stresses to enhance the efficiency, and the ability to meet the challenges of a near unity power factor and output voltage regulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%