1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00196114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pharmacokinetic interaction between roxithromycin and midazolam

Abstract: The interaction between roxithromycin and midazolam was investigated in a double-blind, randomised crossover study of two phases. Ten healthy volunteers were given roxithromycin (300 mg) or placebo once daily for 6 days. On the sixth day they ingested 15 mg midazolam. Plasma samples were collected and psychomotor performance measured for 17 h. Roxithromycin administration significantly increased the area under the plasma midazolam concentration-time curve from 8.3 to 12.2 micrograms.ml-1.min and the eliminatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are also reported to cause many in vivo interactions with drugs that are substrates of CYP3A, and the severity of such interactions varies from macrolide to macrolide (Periti et al, 1992;Westphal, 2000). Whereas erythromycin and clarithromycin markedly affect the AUC of midazolam, a CYP3A substrate, in humans, the effect of azithromycin is reported to be small (Backman et al, 1994;Yeates et al, 1996;Zimmermann et al, 1996). Periti et al (1992) have classified troleandomycin and erythromycin, 14-carbon member ring macrolides, as belonging to the first group with a high drug interaction potential; clarithromycin and roxithromycin (14-carbon), midecamycin and josamycin (16-carbon) belong to the second group, with a low interaction potential; and azithromycin (15-carbon), rokitamycin, and spiramycin (16-carbon) represent the third group with no interaction potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are also reported to cause many in vivo interactions with drugs that are substrates of CYP3A, and the severity of such interactions varies from macrolide to macrolide (Periti et al, 1992;Westphal, 2000). Whereas erythromycin and clarithromycin markedly affect the AUC of midazolam, a CYP3A substrate, in humans, the effect of azithromycin is reported to be small (Backman et al, 1994;Yeates et al, 1996;Zimmermann et al, 1996). Periti et al (1992) have classified troleandomycin and erythromycin, 14-carbon member ring macrolides, as belonging to the first group with a high drug interaction potential; clarithromycin and roxithromycin (14-carbon), midecamycin and josamycin (16-carbon) belong to the second group, with a low interaction potential; and azithromycin (15-carbon), rokitamycin, and spiramycin (16-carbon) represent the third group with no interaction potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a relatively small increase, by a factor of 1.5 and 1.2, has been reported in the case of pretreatment with roxithromycin (300 mg o.d. for 6 days) (Backman et al, 1994) and azithromycin (500 mg o.d. for 3 days) , respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, rifampin pretreatment reduced the area under the drug's plasma concentration-time curve by 96% (224), whereas ketaconazole increased this parameter by 15-fold (200), and itraconazole also resulted in a large effect (139,200,226). More modest changes (two-to fourfold) were found following a single dose of grapefruit juice (181) and a period of erythromycin (161), clarithromycin (227), roxithromycin (228), fluconazole (144), or diltiazem (131) administration. By contrast, several days pretreatment with azithromycin (229)(230)(231) and terbinafine (226) had no effect on midazolam's metabolism.…”
Section: In Vivo Probes Of Cyp3a Activitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The inhibitory activities of clarithromycin and erythromycin on midazolam metabolism were greater than that of roxithromycin in this study, suggesting that the in vitro metabolism results would reflect in vivo interactions. [8][9][10][11][12] Since the inhibitory activities of all tested macrolides on pranlukast metabolism were very weak, it is considered that the in vivo effects of macrolides on pranlukast metabolism would be small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%