1 The e ect of chronic granulomatous in¯ammation of the intestine was studied on the prejunctional modulation of cholinergic nerve activity in the mouse ileum. 2 Contractions to carbachol (0.01 ± 0.3 mM) and to electrical ®eld stimulation (EFS, 0.25 ± 8 Hz) of enteric neurons were higher in in¯amed ileum as compared to control ileum. However, when the neurally-mediated contractions to EFS were expressed as percentage of the direct smooth muscle contraction to carbachol, the responses to EFS were similar in control and in¯amed ileum. 3 Atropine (1 mM) abolished all contractions to EFS and carbachol in control and in¯amed ileum. DMPP (3 ± 30 mM), a nicotinic receptor agonist, induced concentration-dependent contractions that were more pronounced in in¯amed ileum as compared to control ileum. Hexamethonium (100 mM), a nicotinic receptor blocker, signi®cantly inhibited the contractions to EFS in in¯amed ileum but not in control ileum. 4 In control ileum, histamine (10 ± 100 mM) and the histamine H 1 receptor agonist HTMT (3 ± 10 mM) inhibited the contractions to EFS concentration-dependently without a ecting the contractions to carbachol. The inhibitory e ect of histamine and HTMT was prevented by the histamine H 1 antagonist mepyramine (5 ± 10 mM) but not by the H 2 -and H 3 -receptor antagonists cimetidine and thioperamide (both 10 mM). In chronically in¯amed ileum however, histamine (10 ± 100 mM) and HTMT (3 ± 10 mM) failed to inhibit the contractions to EFS. The histamine H 2 and H 3 receptor agonists dimaprit and R(7)-a-methylhistamine did not a ect the contractions to EFS in control and in¯amed ileum. 5 The a 2 -receptor agonist UK 14.304 (0.01 ± 0.1 mM) inhibited the contractions to EFS in control and in¯amed ileum without a ecting the contractions to carbachol. The e ect of UK 14.304 was reversed by the a 2 -receptor antagonist yohimbine (1 mM). The inhibitory e ect of UK 14.304 on contractions to EFS was of similar potency in control and in¯amed ileum. 6 Our results suggest that the prejunctional modulation of cholinergic nerve activity by nicotinic and histaminic H 1 receptors is disturbed during chronic intestinal in¯ammation whereas the modulation by a 2 -receptors is preserved. Such a disturbance of cholinergic nerve activity may contribute to the motility disturbances that are often observed during chronic intestinal diseases in humans.