2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40487-019-0097-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phase 1, Open-Label Study in Healthy Subjects to Evaluate the Absolute Bioavailability of AG-221 by a Microtracer Approach

Abstract: Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the absolute bioavailability (BA) of AG-221 following a single oral dose of 100 mg AG-221 and an intravenous (IV) dose of * 100 lg AG-221 containing approximately 300 nCi of [ 14 C]-AG-221. Methods: This was a phase 1, open-label study. Six subjects who met all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. After an overnight fast of at least 10 h, the subjects received an oral dose (coated tablet) of 100 mg of AG… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For enasidenib (AG-221) and AGI-16903 were analyzed using a validated method. 13 The LLOQ for both AG-221 and AG-16903 in human plasma was 1.0 ng/mL, with linearity demonstrated to 1000 ng/mL for AG-221 and 500 ng/mL for AG-16903. The interassay %CV values, based on the accepted calibration standards across the range, were ≤6.5% for AG-221 and AG-16903.…”
Section: Bioanalysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For enasidenib (AG-221) and AGI-16903 were analyzed using a validated method. 13 The LLOQ for both AG-221 and AG-16903 in human plasma was 1.0 ng/mL, with linearity demonstrated to 1000 ng/mL for AG-221 and 500 ng/mL for AG-16903. The interassay %CV values, based on the accepted calibration standards across the range, were ≤6.5% for AG-221 and AG-16903.…”
Section: Bioanalysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Typical clinical use of a 100 μCi 14 C label requires dosimetry assessments (including rat distribution studies), which impact study timelines due to the requirement for preclinical studies 6, 7 . However, application of sensitive 14 C‐labeled microtracer accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), which can be used to detect ultra‐low microdoses of radiolabel (0.1–1 μCi), circumvents the need for toxicology and dosimetry assessments prior to human dosing and allows for generation of disposition data faster than conventional high‐dose 14 C approaches 7, 8, 9, 10 . These microdoses of 14 C radiolabel are considered insignificant in terms of radioactivity, therefore eliminating the need for animal studies 6, 7, 11, 12 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, 14 C‐microtracer approaches may present several advantages, such as measurement of multiple pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters with reduced interpatient variability (due to a cross‐over type design) and lower cost compared with traditional phase 1 studies. Consequently, this approach is being increasingly used in the evaluation of mass balance of new drugs 8, 9, 13 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations