2018
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-789800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase 1 trial of vadastuximab talirine as monotherapy in patients with CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract: Vadastuximab talirine (SGN-CD33A, 33A) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimers linked to a monoclonal antibody targeting CD33, which is expressed in the majority of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. This phase 1 study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of vadastuximab talirine and determined the recommended monotherapy dose in patients with relapsed or refractory AML. Additional expansion cohorts tested vadastuximab talirine in specific subpop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
92
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
4
92
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the phase 1 dose escalation study of SGN-CD33A, the most common grade 3 adverse events were febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. 41 These adverse events are consistent with on-target myelosuppression because of CD33 expression on myeloid progenitors. Although nontargeted myelosuppression is possible with ADCs, we anticipate a lesser degree of myelosuppression with SGN-CD19B relative to SGN-CD33A because of the fact that CD19 expression is restricted to the B-cell lineage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the phase 1 dose escalation study of SGN-CD33A, the most common grade 3 adverse events were febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. 41 These adverse events are consistent with on-target myelosuppression because of CD33 expression on myeloid progenitors. Although nontargeted myelosuppression is possible with ADCs, we anticipate a lesser degree of myelosuppression with SGN-CD19B relative to SGN-CD33A because of the fact that CD19 expression is restricted to the B-cell lineage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These data compare favorably to preclinical data shown for INO, 53 which recently met its clinical end point in a pivotal phase 3 randomized trial in relapsed/refractory B-ALL demonstrating a significantly higher rate of complete response compared with standard chemotherapy (80.7% vs 29.4%, P , .001). 54 The accessibility of leukemic blasts and confirmed antileukemic activity seen with DNA alkylating agents, including PBD ADCs, 55 suggest that SGN-CD19B may have a high probability of technical success in B-ALL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These doses were chosen to result in approximately 10%, 50% and 90% RO at C max to explore a full range of predictions from the model and to include doses comparable to first-in-human doses administered in the clinic for other ADCs bearing pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD, a DNA binding agent) payloads. 37-39 To evaluate the impact of the uncertainty of the parameters characterizing the PK nonlinearity on the human PK and RO predictions, we generated a multivariate normal distribution of 1000 pairs of values for V max and log(KM) using the model estimations and their covariance matrix. The predicted C max values for these simulated doses were 6.81, 65.4 and 572 ng/mL, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring payload may prove challenging with the development of more potent payloads; next-generation chemotypes such as pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimers have activity at subpicomolar concentrations, 84 with ADC doses in the microgram per kilogram range. 85 Similarly, our understanding of ADC immunogenicity is limited by assay limitations, with interpretations affected by assay sensitivity and specificity, drug interference, and sample handling and timing. Although data suggest little impact of immunogenicity on ADC function, variations in current assay methods, along with confounding factors such as the underlying disease, patient immunological status, and the general paucity of data make it difficult to draw firm conclusions.…”
Section: Areas For Further Discussion and Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%