2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, 2-Year Trial of Pegaptanib Sodium for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
75
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, pegaptanib patients gained 5.2 letters of vision at year 1 compared to 1.2 letters for patients receiving sham. At the end of year 2, pegaptanib patients had gained on average 6.1 letters of vision compared to 1.3 letters for patients in the sham arm of the study (P , 0.01) (Sultan et al 2011).…”
Section: Role Of Angiogenic Factors In Diabetic Macular Edemamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…On average, pegaptanib patients gained 5.2 letters of vision at year 1 compared to 1.2 letters for patients receiving sham. At the end of year 2, pegaptanib patients had gained on average 6.1 letters of vision compared to 1.3 letters for patients in the sham arm of the study (P , 0.01) (Sultan et al 2011).…”
Section: Role Of Angiogenic Factors In Diabetic Macular Edemamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, intravitreal pegaptanib sodium 0.3 mg was well tolerated and demonstrated superior efficacy over the sham in the treatment of patients with DME. The proportion of patients with ≥10 letters (or 2 lines) of visual acuity improvement at week 54 was statistically significantly greater in the pegaptanib group versus those in the sham treatment arm (P = 0.0047; primary efficacy endpoint) (Sultan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Pegaptanibmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It was evaluated in a double-blind sham-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00605280), which found patients in the pegaptanib arm had a greater improvement in visual acuity and a reduced need for rescue focal/grid laser therapy at both 36 weeks and 2 years of follow-up [85]. It has not been evaluated in any other published trial comparing it head-tohead with other therapies.…”
Section: Anti-vegf Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%