2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase 2 study of an oral mTORC1/mTORC2 kinase inhibitor (CC-223) for non-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with or without carcinoid symptoms

Abstract: Second-generation mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors such as CC-223 may have theoretical advantages over first-generation drugs by inhibiting TOR kinase in mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and 2 (mTORC2), potentially improving clinical efficacy for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET).Enrolled patients had metastatic, well-differentiated NET of non-pancreatic gastrointestinal or unknown origin, with/without carcinoid symptoms, had failed ≥1 systemic chemotherapy, and were taking a somatostatin a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetic of CC-223 was evaluated in a daily dose. The results were consistent with those presented in cell lines; anti-tumor activity was assessed, and the data obtained indicated that the drug was safe for patients (221). Additionally, other mTORC1/mTORC2 known as vistusertib was evaluated in a phase II study for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma, in this specific case, the dual inhibitor vistusertib did not show any advantage over mTORC1 inhibitors in the group of patients evaluated (222).…”
Section: Mtorc1 As a Therapeutic Targetsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetic of CC-223 was evaluated in a daily dose. The results were consistent with those presented in cell lines; anti-tumor activity was assessed, and the data obtained indicated that the drug was safe for patients (221). Additionally, other mTORC1/mTORC2 known as vistusertib was evaluated in a phase II study for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma, in this specific case, the dual inhibitor vistusertib did not show any advantage over mTORC1 inhibitors in the group of patients evaluated (222).…”
Section: Mtorc1 As a Therapeutic Targetsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Tumor resistance to everolimus is common and can limit its clinical efficacy. Drugs that target the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway studied in clinical phase 2 trials include the AKT inhibitor MK-2206 [183] and the dual PI3K and mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitor dactolisib (BEZ235) [184,185], although both showed poor activity and tolerability, while the mTORC1/ mTORC2 inhibitor onatasertib (CC-223) demonstrated evidence of disease stability but poor tolerability [186].…”
Section: Novel Therapeutic Approaches and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mTORC1/2 kinase inhibitor named CC-223 was tested in a phase 1/2 study involving metastatic non-pancreatic GI-NETs patients treated with SSA who had failed treatment. The drug showed efficacy in induce tumor regression and carcinoid syndrome symptoms controls and led to an Improvement of median PFS (19.5 months) superior to Everolimus alone (PFS 11.0 months) ( 44 , 67 ). The CC-223 safety profile was found to be comparable to currently approved mTOR inhibitors, and toxicity was well-managed by dose adjustments or treatments ( 67 ).…”
Section: Everolimus and Anti-angiogeneticmentioning
confidence: 99%