2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase 3, multi-center, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin inhalation solution (APT-1026) in stable cystic fibrosis patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Flume et al compared the safety and efficacy of a 28-day course of levofloxacin inhalation solution to placebo in a multinational, randomized, double-blind trial in 330 patients with CF. Although there was an improvement in the relative change in FEV 1 percent predicted from baseline (mean difference 1.31%, p = 0.01), there was in the patients randomized to levofloxacin compared to the placebo arm [64]. Possible explanations for these results include insufficient antibiotic concentrations, dissimilarities in the study populations or an inappropriate definition of an exacerbation.…”
Section: Cystic Fibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flume et al compared the safety and efficacy of a 28-day course of levofloxacin inhalation solution to placebo in a multinational, randomized, double-blind trial in 330 patients with CF. Although there was an improvement in the relative change in FEV 1 percent predicted from baseline (mean difference 1.31%, p = 0.01), there was in the patients randomized to levofloxacin compared to the placebo arm [64]. Possible explanations for these results include insufficient antibiotic concentrations, dissimilarities in the study populations or an inappropriate definition of an exacerbation.…”
Section: Cystic Fibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 240 mg BID group had the greatest reduction in PA density at day 28, with a −1.19 (log CFU/g sputum) difference vs. the placebo. The MPEX-209 study compared MP-376 to a tobramycin solution for inhalation (TIS) in people with CF who had chronic PA lung infection [37,41]. This study showed that LVX was not inferior to TIS as measured by lung function.…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The inhaled LVX aqueous solution initially called MP-376 (brand name Quinsair ® in Europe, or Aeroquin™ in the USA) is a FQ formulation originally developed for the long-term treatment of lung infections caused by PA in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients [32,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. This formulation is the first FQ-inhaled formulation approved in the European Union and Canada.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Properties-developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 28-day on/off regimen, which was selected in an attempt to reduce emergence of tobramycin resistance [16], became the approved indication for inhaled tobramycin and eventually a standard of care in North America. Subsequent inhaled aztreonam [17,18] and inhaled levofloxacin [19,20] development programs have reinforced the “on/off” inhaled antipseudomonal antibiotic treatment paradigm. Initially, this “on/off” period treatment paradigm facilitated creative study designs utilizing placebo controls: patients could be randomized to a new inhaled antibiotic or placebo in the off period following a standard 28-day “on” treatment (in essence a randomized treatment withdrawal design).…”
Section: Efficacy Of Chronic Inhaled Antibiotic Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%