2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase-field simulation of uranium dendrite growth on the cathode in the electrorefining process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nishimura et al 2 suggested that uranium morphology and deposits collection efficiency varied with a ratio of the cathode to anode surface area. Shibuta et al 6,14 systematically explored the influence of applied voltage, zirconium concentration on uranium morphology and size by phase-field simulation. Most recently, Lee et al 13 concluded that the electrorefining of U on a solid electrode is affected by the electrode material and proposed the possibility of using W electrode as an alternative to graphite for effective U recovery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nishimura et al 2 suggested that uranium morphology and deposits collection efficiency varied with a ratio of the cathode to anode surface area. Shibuta et al 6,14 systematically explored the influence of applied voltage, zirconium concentration on uranium morphology and size by phase-field simulation. Most recently, Lee et al 13 concluded that the electrorefining of U on a solid electrode is affected by the electrode material and proposed the possibility of using W electrode as an alternative to graphite for effective U recovery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such phenomenon can be verified by the experimental observation of uranium deposits and is attributable to the exhaustion of uranium cations between the two vicinal growing dendrites. 14,31,32 Therefore, the growth of dendrites is a branching process without any dendritic fusion and insensitive to the roughness of electrode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29][30] For example, Shibuta et al applied the phase-field model to simulate the growth of uranium dendrites on cathode and concluded that the cellular/sproutlike electrodeposits are formed from large primary deposits at all applied voltages and both the planar and cellular/sprout-like electrodeposits are formed from the primary deposits of 10 μm and less. 31,32 Lin et al expanded the electrochemical phase-field model to include stress field induced by the lattice mismatch and reproduced sprout-like, tooth-like, or tree-like morphologies of uranium dendrites. 33 From the master equations of phase-field model, it can be inferred that electrodeposition and morphologies of electrodeposits are controlled by a variety of energetic, kinetic, and processing parameters including the interfacial energy, interfacial thickness, overpotential, diffusion coefficient and temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in case of Cu, the electrorefiner has a flat-plate cathode shape and can be easily scrapped owing to the nature of the material. On the other hand, it is difficult to collect uranium electrodeposits owing to the strong adhesion force of uranium to the cathode; thus, a simple flat-plate cathode arrangement cannot be adopted [15]. Therefore, considerable effort has been directed toward developing a good cathode material and an effective electrode arrangement [16,17]; however, the uranium electrodepositing behavior with respect to the cathode shape (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%