2016
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1251626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase I multi-modelling approach for profile monitoring of signal data

Abstract: Many industrial processes exhibit multiple in-control signatures, where signal data vary over time without affecting the final product quality. They are known as multimode processes. With regard to profile monitoring methodologies, the existence of multiple in-control patterns entails the study and development of novel monitoring schemes. We propose a method based on coupling curve classification and monitoring that inherits the so-called ‘multi-modelling framework’. The goal is to design a monitoring tool tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, Reference [42] presents an overview of the recent contributions to the development of Phase I control charts. Among the latest proposals for control charts, the work of Grasso et al [43] is especially interesting taking into account that is a Phase I control chart proposal for profiles based on the use of functional data depth concept (as well as the case of the present proposal). In fact, they proposed a Phase I control chart methodology for profiles belonging to the "multi-modelling framework", that includes the following stages: (1) a classification stage of new profiles into different operating modes or profile patterns using functional classification techniques from functional data depth measures (maximum depth approach based on Mode depth); (2) even the identification of a novel operation mode is included; (3) Once the operation mode corresponding to a new profile is identified, this is assigned to the corresponding control chart and consequently a suitable control charting method is applied to determine if the process remained in control over the period of time where those data were collected.…”
Section: Control Charts For Phases I and Iimentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, Reference [42] presents an overview of the recent contributions to the development of Phase I control charts. Among the latest proposals for control charts, the work of Grasso et al [43] is especially interesting taking into account that is a Phase I control chart proposal for profiles based on the use of functional data depth concept (as well as the case of the present proposal). In fact, they proposed a Phase I control chart methodology for profiles belonging to the "multi-modelling framework", that includes the following stages: (1) a classification stage of new profiles into different operating modes or profile patterns using functional classification techniques from functional data depth measures (maximum depth approach based on Mode depth); (2) even the identification of a novel operation mode is included; (3) Once the operation mode corresponding to a new profile is identified, this is assigned to the corresponding control chart and consequently a suitable control charting method is applied to determine if the process remained in control over the period of time where those data were collected.…”
Section: Control Charts For Phases I and Iimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The automatic classification of each profile in the corresponding profile pattern could be very useful in the building energy efficiency field and previously to the application of our control chart proposal for Phase I and Phase II. With respect to the work of Grasso et al [43], it is also interesting to mention that the proposed profile monitoring control charting scheme is that based on functional PCA and described in Colosimo and Pacella [57].…”
Section: Measurement and Comparison Of The Performance Of The Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mainstream literature devoted to spatter analysis and monitoring in L-PBF relies on video image processing methods to compute synthetic indices that capture salient aspects of the spatter behaviour, e.g., the number of ejected spatters in each video frame, their size, speed, etc. (Grasso et al, 2017;Everton et al, 2016). In the real-case study presented in this section, instead of treating synthetic descriptors of the spatter ejections as univariate or multivariate variables, the spatter behaviour is translated into a functional format by means of the so-called spatter intensity function introduced in Section 1.…”
Section: Real-case Study: Analysis Of Variance Of Applied To the Anal...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centofanti et al (2020) expand the Mandel's regression control chart (Mandel, 1969) to the functional setting, that is a control chart elaborated on the functional residuals obtained from a function-on-function regression of the quality characteristic profile on concurrent functional covariates. Other relevant contributions in this field include the work of Jin & Shi (1999), Colosimo & Pacella (2007), Colosimo & Pacella (2010), Grasso et al (2017), andBersimis et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%