2013
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.086207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase I study of escalated dose subcutaneous alemtuzumab given weekly with rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a DNA-derived humanized IgG1 kappa mAb with a significant use in patients with genetically high-risk treatment-resistant CLL. [30] The subgroups that were hypothesized to benefit the most included patients with 17p deletion, bone marrow infiltration and refractory autoimmune cytopenia. [30,31] It received approval in the US for the first time in 2001 and was essentially reserved for patients with CLL who had received fludarabine therapy yet had progressive disease.…”
Section: Obinutuzumab (Ga101)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a DNA-derived humanized IgG1 kappa mAb with a significant use in patients with genetically high-risk treatment-resistant CLL. [30] The subgroups that were hypothesized to benefit the most included patients with 17p deletion, bone marrow infiltration and refractory autoimmune cytopenia. [30,31] It received approval in the US for the first time in 2001 and was essentially reserved for patients with CLL who had received fludarabine therapy yet had progressive disease.…”
Section: Obinutuzumab (Ga101)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the relapsed setting, the management of patients with TP53 abnormalities is even more challenging. Several clinical studies have demonstrated that FCR and combinations with high-dose corticosteroids, alemtuzumab or alternative regimens consisting of rituximab, oxaliplatin, cytarabine and fludarabine (OFAR) have only limited and short-term efficacy and are associated with high toxicity rates 3743 . However, depending on doses and application routes, it also seems feasible that alemtuzumab-based regimens can serve as a means to “bridge” the time to HSCT.…”
Section: The Unmet Need Of Poor Risk Cll Patients Before the Availabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve a good remission state is however challenging, and as discussed before, some regimens that appear suitable come to the cost of high toxicities. Recent studies indicate that modified OFAR and alemtuzumab based regimens are the most favorable strategies to help prepare patients for successful HSCT by achieving good remissions 43,6971 . In general, pre-transplant characteristics as assessed by the EBMT risk score seem to be of predictive value for OS: this score uses five patient-specific pre-transplant variables (age, disease status, time from diagnosis to transplant, donor type, and donor–recipient sex combination) 72 .…”
Section: Evidence For the Efficacy Of Hsct In Cllmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rituximab [Brown et al 2010]. Although these patients were very heavily pretreated, with a median of four prior lines of therapy, the median OS of 47 months is the most encouraging of any nonrandomized alemtuzumab trial in the relapsed/refractory setting.…”
Section: Total Number Treated 817mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 3, most of the larger trials have evaluated the combination of alemtuzumab with rituximab or with fludarabine. We identified 14 nonrandomized two-agent trials [Kennedy, 2002;Faderl et al 2003Faderl et al , 2010Nabhan et al 2004;Elter et al 2005;Pettitt et al 2006Pettitt et al , 2012Flowers et al 2007;Egle et al 2009Egle et al , 2010Brown et al 2010;Stilgenbauer et al 2010;Tedeschi et al 2011;Pospisilova et al 2012], three nonrandomized three-agent trials [Montillo et al 2011;Zent et al 2011;Elter et al 2012], one nonrandomized four-agent trial [Badoux et al 2011], and two randomized trials [Gribben et al 2005;Elter et al 2011]. In addition, UKCLL02 (Table 2) re-exposed 17 fludarabine-refractory patients (32% of the cohort) to fludarabine in combination with alemtuzumab [Varghese et al 2010].…”
Section: Delayed Toxicities and The Role Of Infection Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%