2005
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.7072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase II study of gefitinib as a dirst-line therapy of advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung in lifetime non-smokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Phase II studies in Japan, response rates range from 21 to 33.3% 38–41 . Notably, a Phase II study in Korea observed a response rate of 61.1% 42 . A retrospective analysis in Taiwanese patients with advanced NSCLC with very poor performance status found that the objective responses to gefitinib were more frequent among patients who had never been treated with a chemotherapeutic agent (38.1%) compared with patients who had failed ≥1 regimen (16.1%) 36 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Phase II studies in Japan, response rates range from 21 to 33.3% 38–41 . Notably, a Phase II study in Korea observed a response rate of 61.1% 42 . A retrospective analysis in Taiwanese patients with advanced NSCLC with very poor performance status found that the objective responses to gefitinib were more frequent among patients who had never been treated with a chemotherapeutic agent (38.1%) compared with patients who had failed ≥1 regimen (16.1%) 36 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response rates varied from 24.5 [13] to 33.3% [14] in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with gefitinib [14,15] or erlotinib [13]. One trial from South Korea disclosed response rates of 61% with a median response duration of 30 weeks in non-smokers with advanced or metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several phase II studies presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2005 meeting examined the efficacy of single-agent erlotinib and gefitinib as first-line therapy [12][13][14][15]. The response rates varied from 24.5 [13] to 33.3% [14] in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with gefitinib [14,15] or erlotinib [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48,49 A recently reported second-line study (n = 240) of pemetrexed (day 1) and erlotinib (days 2–14) resulted in statistically significant improvements in PFS and OS compared to either pemetrexed or erlotinib monotherapy in clinically enriched advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients whose EGFR genotype status was only known in 44 cases (18%). 50 Another study suggested that East Asian patients treated with pemetrexed and erlotinib combination experienced a longer median PFS (7.4 months) compared to erlotinib (4.5 months) and pemetrexed (4.0 months).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%