2020
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phase II Trial of 5-Day Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Patients with High-Risk Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Abstract: In a single-institution phase II study, we evaluated the safety of a 5-day dose-equivalent neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) regimen for high-risk primary soft tissue sarcoma.Patients and Methods: Patients received neoadjuvant RT alone (30 Gy in five fractions) to the primary tumor with standard margins. The primary endpoint was grade ≥2 late-radiation toxicity. Major wound complications, local recurrences, and distant metastases were also examined. In exploratory analysis, we evaluated germline biomarkers for wou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of grade ≥2 radiation-associated toxicity (fibrosis, joint stiffness, or lymphedema) after median follow-up of two years was tolerable (16%). The oncology outcomes are good with a 5.7% rate of local recurrence after surgery [34]. In our current study the rate of late morbidity was also relatively low, with 13.8% of long-term radiation-induced toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The rate of grade ≥2 radiation-associated toxicity (fibrosis, joint stiffness, or lymphedema) after median follow-up of two years was tolerable (16%). The oncology outcomes are good with a 5.7% rate of local recurrence after surgery [34]. In our current study the rate of late morbidity was also relatively low, with 13.8% of long-term radiation-induced toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Data presented in the Table 1 suggest that this assumption may be correct because local control in all described regimens is higher than 80% despite various EQD2. Interestingly, HFRT regimen described by Koseła-Paterczyk et al (25 Gy in 5 fractions) given in the majority of patients without preoperative chemotherapy provided lower (but acceptable) local control than regimens with higher fraction and total doses (30 Gy in 5 fractions) or one with the same fractionation regimen but combined with sequential anthracycline-based chemotherapy (5,27,30,31). The same 5 × 5 Gy regimen without chemotherapy but with delayed surgery resulted in 100% 1-year control rate in patients with myxoid liposarcomas that are considered radiosensitive (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative HFRT in STS has been validated in retrospective analyses, prospective registries, and phase I-II clinical trials (5,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). However, randomized phase III trials comparing preoperative CFRT with HFRT are lacking.…”
Section: Available Evidence and Hfrt Regimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.20.20038885 doi: medRxiv preprint of incisional wound vacuums. 13 This can be compared to the historical standard 5-year local control of 93%. 1 Table ??…”
Section: /10mentioning
confidence: 99%