2003
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phase III trial of sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma

Abstract: BACKGROUNDThe current study was performed to assess whether sequential potentially noncross‐resistant chemotherapy prolongs disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with operable breast carcinoma.METHODSSeven hundred eighty‐nine patients were registered and followed for a median of 10 years. They were treated in two groups. In Group 1, patients age < 50 years or age > 50 years but with either negative or unknown estrogen receptor (ER) status were randomized to receive 6 cycles of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although patients ≥50 y of age with estrogen receptor–positive disease were randomized to receive tamoxifen or 6 cycles of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide plus 4 cycles of methotrexate and vinblastine, those who received tamoxifen were excluded from our retrospective study, so all patients in our study received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy without tamoxifen. The previous clinical protocol failed to show any benefit from the addition of four cycles of methotrexate and vinblastine to six cycles of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, so both groups were regarded as having similar doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (26). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although patients ≥50 y of age with estrogen receptor–positive disease were randomized to receive tamoxifen or 6 cycles of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide plus 4 cycles of methotrexate and vinblastine, those who received tamoxifen were excluded from our retrospective study, so all patients in our study received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy without tamoxifen. The previous clinical protocol failed to show any benefit from the addition of four cycles of methotrexate and vinblastine to six cycles of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, so both groups were regarded as having similar doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (26). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Group 2, patients Ն 50 years with ER-positive disease were randomized to receive either tamoxifen or combination chemotherapy (FAC and MV) for 10 cycles. 24 The 96 patients selected for immunohistochemistry study were the only patients treated with FAC from whom tissue specimens were available. All patients underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery between December 1986 and January 1994.…”
Section: Patients and Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the next line of chemotherapy against TAM-resistant breast cancer involves a methotrexate-or cisplatin-containing regimen (Blumenschein et al 1997, Assikis et al 2003, a study on whether the expression levels of the ABC transporter can be changed in TAM-resistant breast cancer cells might lead to a better understanding of the pathological implications of TAM resistance. This study shows for the first time that the expression of MRP2 is higher in TAMR-MCF-7 cells when compared with those in MCF-7 cells and demonstrates that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase)-dependent activation of PXR is essential for the induction of MRP2 in TAM-resistant breast cancer cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%