2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phenology- and trend-based approach for accurate mapping of sea-level driven coastal forest retreat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the Virginia Coast Reserve Long‐Term Ecological Research repository at https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/4ae5ac3fbdb6a20dcdcb2ff36487d292%0A (Chen & Kirwan, 2023a), and https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/4edf9b0d9d6660d354710748b2cf56f0 (Chen & Kirwan, 2023b).…”
Section: Data Availability Statementsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the Virginia Coast Reserve Long‐Term Ecological Research repository at https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/4ae5ac3fbdb6a20dcdcb2ff36487d292%0A (Chen & Kirwan, 2023a), and https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/4edf9b0d9d6660d354710748b2cf56f0 (Chen & Kirwan, 2023b).…”
Section: Data Availability Statementsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We differenced the landcover maps in 1984 and 2020 to identify areas of forest change, and then estimated rates of lateral and vertical forest retreat based on unique patterns of forest boundary change. The step‐by‐step methodology is illustrated in Figure 2, modified from the framework in Chen and Kirwan (2022b) to quantify both lateral and vertical forest retreat. In brief, there are four patterns of forest loss depending on coastal tree line configuration: Interior loss (P1: emerging forest loss, tree line present only in 2020), Entire loss (P2: complete patch loss, tree line present only in 1984), Linear retreat (P3: parallel retreat with conjoint tree lines in 1984 and 2020), and Radial retreat (P4: concentric retreat with disjoint tree lines in 1984 and 2020) (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average rate of relative sea level rise has increased from 2.45 mm yr −1 (1953-1983) to 4.7-6.2 mm yr −1 (1975-2021) (Ezer, 2023;Ezer & Atkinson, 2015). Concurrent with accelerating sea level rise rates, coastal forests migrated upslope and horizontal forest retreat rates accelerated from 3.1 m yr −1 (1985-2000) to 4.7 m yr −1 (2001-2020) in a portion of the Chesapeake Bay (Chen & Kirwan, 2022a). By 2100, 1,050-3,748 km 2 of uplands are projected to convert to marsh, largely at the expense of terrestrial forests and freshwater forested wetlands (Molino et al, 2022).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The climate there is characterized by hot, humid summers and cool winters. The Chesapeake Bay region is a hotspot for sea‐level‐driven coastal forest retreat, driven by rapid SLR across a gently sloping coastal plain topography (Schieder et al ., 2018; Chen & Kirwan, 2022a,b). The 20 th century relative SLR rates in the Chesapeake Bay region ( c .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our predictive certainty regarding ghost forest formation is poor due to a lack of understanding of the physiological processes underlying tree death from SLR, and due to the lack of vegetation dynamic models developed for shoreline ecosystems (McDowell et al ., 2022; Yoshikai et al ., 2022). Predictions are further complicated by the confounding impacts of SLR and other climate change factors such as rising atmospheric CO 2 levels (Chen & Kirwan, 2022a,b). Our poor capacity to predict the rate of ghost forest formation impedes assessment and mitigation of ecosystem services and terrestrial habitat losses due to SLR (Kirwan & Gedan, 2019; Ward et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%