A Phenomenological Analysis of the Distinction Between Structural Rules and Particle Rules in Dialogical Logic

Shafiei, Mohammad

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21313-8_3

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…8 This is a wonderful property of a logical framework, as far as the exact investigations pertained to transcendental logic are concerned. Among the various frameworks developed in the last century, besides EG, Dialogical logic introduced by Paul Lorenzen and Kuno Lorenz also possesses such a property, as I discussed inShafiei (2019). About the basic accordance of the dialogal logic with the logical features offered by the transcendental investigations, I have discussed inShafiei (2018).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Peirce’s Existential Graphs as a Contribution to Transcendental Logic

Shafiei

2019

Peirce and Husserl: Mutual Insights on Logic, Mathematics and Cognition

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peirce, among his vast logical works, also invented a less known logical framework called by him Existential Graphs. It offers a diagrammatic method to represent logical expressions and logical deductions, so that logical deductions are formulated as transformations of diagrams. In this paper, after a short introduction to Existential Graphs (EGs hereafter), I will propose an interpretation of the framework of EGs in a way that it offers a method for meaning explanation of logical connectives. According to this interpretation, I will try to show, that the meaning explanation displayed by EG is different both from truth-functional and inferentialist approaches. I will focus on the philosophical merits of this framework, more precisely I am going to suggest that the features of EGs satisfy certain essential criteria of a theory of logic as put forward by transcendental investigations. Indeed EGs provide us with a powerful tool to carry out logical analyses not only in a formal way but also as belonging to what Husserl calls the "phenomenology of reason".

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Peirce’s Existential Graphs as a Contribution to Transcendental Logic

Shafiei

2019

Peirce and Husserl: Mutual Insights on Logic, Mathematics and Cognition

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

On Kant and Husserl on transcendental logic

Shafiei

Mesgari

2020

Synthese

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is well known that the notion of transcendental logic has a prominent role in both Kant's and Husserl's theories of knowledge. The main aim of the present paper is to study the links between formal and transcendental logic in Husserl on the one hand, and the links between general logic and transcendental logic in Kant on the other. There is a debate about the proper relation between transcendental logic and general logic in Kant's philosophy. By means of our definition of transcendental logic, mainly drawn from Husserl's analyses, we will try to offer an appropriate interpretation of Kant's view.

show abstract

A Phenomenological Analysis of the Distinction Between Structural Rules and Particle Rules in Dialogical Logic

Cited by 2 publications

References 6 publications

Peirce’s Existential Graphs as a Contribution to Transcendental Logic

Peirce’s Existential Graphs as a Contribution to Transcendental Logic

On Kant and Husserl on transcendental logic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About