2010
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00153.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phenomenological Exploration of the Experiences of Dual‐Career Lesbian and Gay Couples

Abstract: Dual‐career lesbian and gay couples face unique struggles as they encounter relational and workplace discrimination. This phenomenological study explored how relationship and career intersect for lesbian and gay couples. Three themes emerged that described how couples successfully blended relationship and career: planfulness, creating positive social networks, and shifting from marginalization to consolidation and integration. The implications of these results are discussed regarding practice and research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“….. [so I] keep my personal life, my personal life and my work life, my work life” (Mercier, , p. 39). Additionally, sexual minority employees report being extremely “planful” and “very calculated” in maneuvering the work–family border in an attempt to manage information across domains (O'Ryan & McFarland, , p. 74).…”
Section: Work–family Border Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“….. [so I] keep my personal life, my personal life and my work life, my work life” (Mercier, , p. 39). Additionally, sexual minority employees report being extremely “planful” and “very calculated” in maneuvering the work–family border in an attempt to manage information across domains (O'Ryan & McFarland, , p. 74).…”
Section: Work–family Border Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developmental disruptions during men's coming out experiences can create numerous additional challenges for gay couples (Connolly, 2004;Rostosky, Riggle, Gray, & Hatton, 2007). These include problems related to partners' communication styles (Domingue & Mollen, 2009), sex (Neilands, Chakravarty, Darbes, Beougher, & Hoff, 2010), and power differentials (O'Ryan & McFarland, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is larger than the sample sizes of other qualitative studies of couples (ChaeWeon & EunKyung, 2011;Connolly, 2005;Kemp, 2011;O'Ryan, & McFarland, 2010), its findings cannot be generalized to the religious population as a whole or even to the Modern-Orthodox population in Israel. One is its sample size.…”
Section: Limitations Contributions and Recommendations For Practicementioning
confidence: 73%