2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-013-1701-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phenomenological Model for Tool Wear in Friction Stir Welding of Metal Matrix Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another case is when high strength tool materials are used in the welding of high melting point or highly abrasive alloys. Tool materials that are wear resistant are often more brittle and prone to facture, which can dictate that more conservative parameters be used to protect the tool [52]. In cases such as this, process variants might be used to recapture some of the weld strength lost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another case is when high strength tool materials are used in the welding of high melting point or highly abrasive alloys. Tool materials that are wear resistant are often more brittle and prone to facture, which can dictate that more conservative parameters be used to protect the tool [52]. In cases such as this, process variants might be used to recapture some of the weld strength lost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments have shown that assuming a linear relationship between tool wear and distance traversed is valid, given particular rotation speeds Fig. 7 Rotating plug model and traverse rates [8]. The linear decrease in probe radius began at 20 s and continued throughout the simulation.…”
Section: Simulating Uniform Probe Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Prater et al [8], a formula was developed through statistical analysis that predicts the amount of wear on a steel trivex tool while welding MMC (Al 359/SiC/20P). The percentage tool wear is given by [8] W ¼ 0:584ðl Þ À 1:038ðvÞ þ 0:009ðwÞ À 6:028…”
Section: Tool Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…correspond to divergent results. This may be a consequence of the asymmetry of effects: in the study by Prater et al, 8 the process variables do not carry equal weight (i.e. a change in one variable may have a greater impact on wear than a proportional change in another variable).…”
Section: The Derivation Of the Dimensionless Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are comparatively fewer studies of the tool wear which accompanies FSW of metal composites. Foremost of these is the progression of tool wear in FSW of aluminum MMCs reinforced with aluminum oxide particles (volume fraction 20%) documented by Prado et al 6,7 The study by Prater et al 8 builds upon this study, quantifying the contribution of three major process variables (rotation speed, traverse speed, and length of weld) on the amount of wear as well as developing a predictive process model of wear based on empirical data. Wear in these experiments was measured using an optical technique: pre-and post-weld images of the tool probe were compared in computer imaging software to quantitatively assess the degree of volume loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%