1994
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4534(94)90120-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A photoemission study of Bi3.6Pb0.4Sr3Ca2.4Er0.7Cu4O16 in normal and superconducting states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that TBHF + calculations reproduce the essentially localized nature of this feature, but show it to have strongly mixed Cu 3d and O 2p character [9]. Thus we conclude that while giving clear information about the screened nature of the final state, resonant photoemission within the main valence band of Cu II compounds may not be a particularly safe guide to the degree of Cu character of the initial state as the d 9 L 1 final state is not directly accessible via the resonating state, resulting, as we have seen, in very weak effects across the binding energy range 1-8 eV [25,26]. The appreciable Cu character in this part of the spectral profile indicates that CuO is somewhat different to a conventional charge-transfer insulator.…”
Section: Direct Comparison With CI Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We note that TBHF + calculations reproduce the essentially localized nature of this feature, but show it to have strongly mixed Cu 3d and O 2p character [9]. Thus we conclude that while giving clear information about the screened nature of the final state, resonant photoemission within the main valence band of Cu II compounds may not be a particularly safe guide to the degree of Cu character of the initial state as the d 9 L 1 final state is not directly accessible via the resonating state, resulting, as we have seen, in very weak effects across the binding energy range 1-8 eV [25,26]. The appreciable Cu character in this part of the spectral profile indicates that CuO is somewhat different to a conventional charge-transfer insulator.…”
Section: Direct Comparison With CI Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 73%