1981
DOI: 10.1086/159236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A photometric study of the dwarf nova WZ Sagittae in outburst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
107
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WZ Sagittae appears to have shown a similar event about 30 days after the superoutburst began, in all three of its recorded eruptions (in 1913, 1946, and 1978; see Fig. 1 of Patterson et al 1981). A similar bump is evident in a well-observed supermaximum of SU UMa, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Bumps In the Eruption Light Curvesupporting
confidence: 52%
“…WZ Sagittae appears to have shown a similar event about 30 days after the superoutburst began, in all three of its recorded eruptions (in 1913, 1946, and 1978; see Fig. 1 of Patterson et al 1981). A similar bump is evident in a well-observed supermaximum of SU UMa, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Bumps In the Eruption Light Curvesupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The latter type of humps with a period of 0.05726(1) d, 1.0% longer than the orbital period, is "superhumps." Although there had been a suggestion of two types of periodic modulation during the 1978 outburst (Bohusz & Udalski 1979), the evidence was not yet compelling because of the remaining ambiguity in identifying the hump maxima and cycle counts, as already discussed by Patterson et al (1981). Our continuous coverage of the entire outburst first unambiguously established the two periods of 0.056656(2) d and 0.05726(1) d for "early superhumps" and "genuine" superhumps, respectively 2 .…”
Section: Observations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, it is by no means obvious that combining data from different outbursts is warranted! WZ Sagittae could be significantly more stable than the other stars, although this is difficult to assess because of the simultaneous presence of an orbital hump (Patterson et al 1981). The period excess of this super hump [(.P, h -P orb )/ P orb ] is also notably low at 0.8%, nearly three times smaller than any other star.…”
Section: Understanding the Superhump Period Changes 81 A Period-magnmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Eruptions to about ninth magnitude in 1907, 1962, and 1973 earned it a classification as a recurrent nova, based on an empirical rule of thumb which associated dwarf novae with eruptions of smaller amplitude (<5 mag) and greater frequency (weeks to months). However, the well-observed 1978 outburst of WZ Sagittae-previously classified as a recurrent nova on the same grounds-made it clear that that star, at least, was a certifiable dwarf nova (Gilliland and Kemper 1980;Patterson et al 1981 ), with the outburst arising from the release of accretion energy in a disk around the white dwarf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%