1989
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.16288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomy of iguanian lizards (Reptilia, Squamata)

Abstract: APPENDIX 3 1973), fossil acrodonts (e.g., iMimeosaurus*) are also known from the Upper Cretaceous, and several scleroglossan squamate groups were well-diversified by the Upper Jurassic (Estes, 1983a,b). Thus, if the hypotheses of squamate phylogeny are correct, Iguania must have been present in the Jurassic.Major, likely monophyletic, groups within Iguanidae* were first recognized by Etheridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
278
0
24

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
11
278
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional work describing the sperm ultrastructure of the families Corytophanidae, Crotaphytidae, Hoplocercidae, Iguanidae, Opluridae, and Phrynosomatidae (Frost & Etheridge, 1989) are warranted and may cast light on the phylogenetic relationships of iguanians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional work describing the sperm ultrastructure of the families Corytophanidae, Crotaphytidae, Hoplocercidae, Iguanidae, Opluridae, and Phrynosomatidae (Frost & Etheridge, 1989) are warranted and may cast light on the phylogenetic relationships of iguanians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iguania is a monophyletic assemblage of nine families of squamate reptiles whose phylogenetics relationships are poorly understood (Frost & Etheridge, 1989). Studies on the sperm ultrastructure have been carried out in five families of iguanians: Chamaeleonidae, Iguanidae, Phrynosomatidae, Polychrotidae, and Tropiduridae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothesized composition: Enyalioides, Hoplocercus, and Morunasaurus (see below). Diagnostic apomorphies: see Etheridge and de Queiroz (1988), Frost and Etheridge (1989), and Wiens and Etheridge (2003). Comments: Hoplocercinae (Macey et al, 1997a) was selected over several older names for the same clade: hoplocercines (Smith et al, 1973), morunasaurines (Estes and Price, 1973), morunasaurs (Etheridge and de Queiroz, 1988), and Hoplocercidae (Frost and Etheridge, 1989).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Nomenclature Of Hoplocercinaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neotropical lizard clade Hoplocercinae (sensu Schulte et al, 2003; =Hoplocercidae of Frost and Etheridge, 1989;=morunasaurs [informal] of Etheridge and de Queiroz, 1988) has been inferred as a basal clade within Iguanidae (Etheridge and de Queiroz, 1988;Schulte et al, 1998Schulte et al, , 2003. Hoplocercinae includes 11 currently recognized species assigned to three taxa traditionally ranked as genera: Enyalioides cofanorum, E. heterolepis, E. laticeps, E. microlepis, E. oshaughnessyi, E. palpebralis, E. praestabilis, Hoplocercus spinosus, Morunasaurus annularis, M. groi, and M. peruvianus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that a related genus of anole, Phenacosaurus, also may be derived from within the genus Anolis (Williams, 1989) but we are unable to address that question with the present data set. Morphological data do not support the recognition of Chamaelinorops as a valid genus, and Chamaeleolis is supported by only two characters (Frost and Etheridge, 1989).…”
Section: Ggtta-tgt ••• Tg----------+---------+---------+---------+mentioning
confidence: 83%