2014
DOI: 10.1093/em/cau100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phylogenetic analysis of Orlando Gibbons's Prelude in G

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such cases can be ideal for phylogenetic analysis when variation is thought to re ect cultural transmission. The 16 di erent versions of Orlando Gibbon's "Prelude in G", for example, have slight variations like doubled and dotted notes that were introduced and spread during serial transcription (Windram et al, 2014). Similarly, di erent performances of Bach's sonatas for violin have variation in characteristics like chord ratios, vibrato, and tempo changes that appear to be clustered into recording periods (Liebman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Classical Musicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cases can be ideal for phylogenetic analysis when variation is thought to re ect cultural transmission. The 16 di erent versions of Orlando Gibbon's "Prelude in G", for example, have slight variations like doubled and dotted notes that were introduced and spread during serial transcription (Windram et al, 2014). Similarly, di erent performances of Bach's sonatas for violin have variation in characteristics like chord ratios, vibrato, and tempo changes that appear to be clustered into recording periods (Liebman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Classical Musicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, scientists have attempted to apply microevolutionary methods to a variety of Western and non-Western genres in the form of sequence alignment techniques adapted from molecular biology (Mongeau and Sankoff, 1990;van Kranenburg et al 2009;Toussaint, 2013;Windram et al, 2014;Savage and Atkinson, 2015). Such techniques make it possible to automate things like quantifying melodic similarities and identifying boundaries between tune families (Savage and Atkinson 2015; Jan, 2018), making analysis possible on vast scales that would be impossible to perform manually.…”
Section: Microevolution and Tune Family Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While modernist composers in the 20 th century believed that the only constraint on musical evolution was a lack of imagination to move outside the realms of established tradition (62), our analysis suggests instead specific mechanisms that limit some boundaries of musical creativity. Such mechanisms are relevant not only for understanding the evolution of traditional folk songs but also for art music (36) and popular music (25,63) around the world, with applications to areas such as music copyright law and cover song detection (11,46,64,65). Overall, our findings suggest that even human artistic creativity can be understood as an evolutionary process that demonstrates cross-cultural regularities.…”
Section: Figure 3 Differences In Tonal Systems For Highly Related Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by such analogies, here we use a novel method to quantitatively test for the presence of general mechanisms of musical evolution by adapting automated sequence alignment algorithms originally developed by molecular geneticists and later applied to language, music, and other domains of culture (33)(34)(35)(36)(37). We use this method to quantify rates of evolution for three specific mechanisms we predicted would constrain musical evolution based on applying evolutionary theory to music cognition (38,39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%