2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-1181-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phylogeny of Cichlidogyrus spp. (Monogenea, Dactylogyridea) clarifies a host-switch between fish families and reveals an adaptive component to attachment organ morphology of this parasite genus

Abstract: BackgroundParasite switches to new host species are of fundamental scientific interest and may be considered an important speciation mechanism. For numerous monogenean fish parasites, infecting different hosts is associated with morphological adaptations, in particular of the attachment organ (haptor). However, haptoral morphology in Cichlidogyrus spp. (Monogenea, Dactylogyridea), parasites of African cichlids, has been mainly linked to phylogenetic rather than to host constraints. Here we determined the posit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, Table 3), no structural morphological difference except a size difference was seen in the MCO. This discrepancy has been previously reported in other monogenean species belonging to Pseudorhabdosynochus Yamaguti, 1958 (Sigura and Justine, 2008) and Cichlidogyrus (Messu Mandeng et al, 2015). This is supposed to be influenced by the degree of host genetic differentiation correlated with the age of the parasite lineage (Poulin, 1992(Poulin, , 2007Poulin and Morand, 2004).…”
Section: Intra-specific Morphological Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 70%
“…3, Table 3), no structural morphological difference except a size difference was seen in the MCO. This discrepancy has been previously reported in other monogenean species belonging to Pseudorhabdosynochus Yamaguti, 1958 (Sigura and Justine, 2008) and Cichlidogyrus (Messu Mandeng et al, 2015). This is supposed to be influenced by the degree of host genetic differentiation correlated with the age of the parasite lineage (Poulin, 1992(Poulin, , 2007Poulin and Morand, 2004).…”
Section: Intra-specific Morphological Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 70%
“… Morand et al (2002) assume that haptoral structures do not reflect a phylogenetic pattern as a result of adaptation to microhabitat within the host. Moreover, Messu Mandeng et al (2015) point out an adaptive component in the attachment organ morphology of Cichlidogyrus . However, other studies suggest the existence of a phylogenetic signal in sclerite morphology and shape within dactylogyridean monogeneans ( Šimková et al, 2002 ; Šimková et al, 2006 ) and specifically within Cichlidogyrus ( Vignon, Pariselle & Vanhove, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, in Cichlidogyrus (Family: Ancyrocephalidae), sclerite (including anchors) shape was found to contain significant phylogenetic signal ( Vignon, Pariselle & Vanhove, 2011 ). However, this conclusion needs to be qualified in light of the recent demonstration of a host-switching event in Cichlidogyrus ( Messu Mandeng et al, 2015 ), which was missed in Vignon, Pariselle & Vanhove (2011) because the host range (at the familial level of the fish hosts) of Cichlidoygrus was not taken into consideration. For Ligophorus , the significant phylogenetic signal found in the anchors does not appear to need similar qualification, since its host range is currently known to be restricted to mullets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%