2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phylogeny of Diprotodontia (Marsupialia) based on sequences for five nuclear genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

38
103
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
38
103
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This coincides with when the mycophagy specialist Potoroidae diverged from the Macropodidae, a group that includes kangaroos and wallabies (16 million years ago; Meredith et al 2009). The presence of specialist spore dispersers may have supported an increased diversity of sequestrate fungi; however, that cannot be determined from these data.…”
Section: Mycophagymentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This coincides with when the mycophagy specialist Potoroidae diverged from the Macropodidae, a group that includes kangaroos and wallabies (16 million years ago; Meredith et al 2009). The presence of specialist spore dispersers may have supported an increased diversity of sequestrate fungi; however, that cannot be determined from these data.…”
Section: Mycophagymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This floristic diversification potentially promoted sequestration through provision of ectomycorrhizal hosts in the dry or seasonally dry habitats thought to benefit sequestrate morphologies. The floristic changes that occurred during the mid-Miocene, including the expansion of sclerophyll forest and grasslands, enabled the radiation of terrestrial marsupials such as kangaroos and wallabies and, thus, improved the spore-dispersal potential for sequestrate fungi (Meredith et al 2009). Additionally, marsupials highly specialised for mycophagy, such as potoroids, and which currently consume sequestrate fungi in particular, emerged c. 16 million years ago (Claridge and May 1994;Meredith et al 2009;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly contentious has been the early branching pattern within Metatheria. For example, it is unclear whether Paucituberculata or Didelphimorphia are the sister group to the remaining marsupials (Meredith, Westerman & Springer, 2009). Furthermore, the phylogenetic position of the enigmatic Microbiotheria, represented by only one American species ‘monito del monte’ ( Dromiciops gliroides ), differs among studies (Springer et al, 1998; Burk et al, 1999; Amrine-Madsen et al, 2003; Nilsson et al, 2003; Nilsson et al, 2004), but is usually placed among the Australasian marsupials, implying a biogeographical history that is not straightforward to interpret.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2n = 22 chromosome complement is common amongst marsupials; however, the arrangement of the 18 conserved autosomal segments is not the same between 2n = 22 species from different families [6,17], weakening the argument for it being the ancestral chromosome number. If the marsupial ancestor had a 2n = 22 chromosome complement, it would probably resemble karyotypes of members of Family Didelphidae with 22 chromosomes, since the American marsupials are at the base of the marsupial phylogenetic tree [13,18]. The strongest evidence for the higher ancestral number is the presence of interstitial telomere signals in members of Didelphidae with 2n = 18 or 2n = 14 karyotypes, suggesting that lower diploid number karyotypes were derived by chromosome fusions, ultimately leading to the 2n = 14 karyotype commonly found amongst marsupials, and recognised as the basal karyotype of Australidelphia [12,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%