2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00253-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phylogeny of robber flies (Diptera: Asilidae) at the subfamilial level: molecular evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
31
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…52), postmetacoxal area entirely sclerotized (102). The Ommatiinae has been considered to be a monophyletic taxon that is usually associated with the Asilinae or Apocleinae sensu previous au-thors (e.g., Karl, 1959;Hull, 1962;Lehr, 1969Lehr, , 1996Papavero, 1973a;Bybee et al, 2004). In the present analysis, the included genera Afroestricus, Cophinopoda, Emphysomera, Michotamia, and Ommatius form a polytomy in the strict consensus hypothesis ( fig.…”
Section: A Revised Higher-level Classification Of Asilidaementioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…52), postmetacoxal area entirely sclerotized (102). The Ommatiinae has been considered to be a monophyletic taxon that is usually associated with the Asilinae or Apocleinae sensu previous au-thors (e.g., Karl, 1959;Hull, 1962;Lehr, 1969Lehr, , 1996Papavero, 1973a;Bybee et al, 2004). In the present analysis, the included genera Afroestricus, Cophinopoda, Emphysomera, Michotamia, and Ommatius form a polytomy in the strict consensus hypothesis ( fig.…”
Section: A Revised Higher-level Classification Of Asilidaementioning
confidence: 76%
“…The only phylogenetic analysis of Asilidae representing most of the higher-level taxa sensu previous authors is the molecular study published by Bybee et al (2004; fig. 130).…”
Section: Discussion Previous Versus the Present Phyloge-netic Hypothementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Papavero (1973) proposed eight subfamilies: "Apocleinae, Asilinae, Dasypogoninae, Laphriinae, Laphystiinae, Ommatiinae, Stenopogoninae, and Trigonomiminae". According to the taxonomist, up to an additional four subfamilies were added by the early 2000s: "Atomosinae, Dioctriinae, Megapodinae and Stichopogoninae" (Artigas and Papavero, 1988;Bybee et al, 2004;Dikow and Geller-Grimm, 2004;Geller-Grimm, 2003a and2004;Lehr, 1969.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%