1980
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(80)90046-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A physically-based constitutive model for metal deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The varying strain hardening rates in Figures 4(d) through (f) can be interpreted as increased softening due to dynamic recovery as strain rate decreases, permitting more time for concurrent recovery. [31,32] Thus, the result is an indication that hardening rate has positive strain rate dependence due to dynamic recovery. A combination of higher strain hardening rate, a higher rate sensitivity of the strain hardening rate, and a higher rate sensitivity of flow stress (m~0.4 to 0.5) exert stabilizing influence on deformation to enhance uniform and postuniform elongations at 200°C and strain rates of 2 9 10 -4 s -1 and lower.…”
Section: A Enhanced Formabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The varying strain hardening rates in Figures 4(d) through (f) can be interpreted as increased softening due to dynamic recovery as strain rate decreases, permitting more time for concurrent recovery. [31,32] Thus, the result is an indication that hardening rate has positive strain rate dependence due to dynamic recovery. A combination of higher strain hardening rate, a higher rate sensitivity of the strain hardening rate, and a higher rate sensitivity of flow stress (m~0.4 to 0.5) exert stabilizing influence on deformation to enhance uniform and postuniform elongations at 200°C and strain rates of 2 9 10 -4 s -1 and lower.…”
Section: A Enhanced Formabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is reported that such microplastic strains are the main reason for nonlinear elastic response, the change in Young's modulus, and the difference in Young's modulus with regard to elastic loading and unloading [13]. This phenomenon is explained by the motion of dislocations between obstacles, the release of dislocations from cell walls, and their reaction with other mobile dislocations [14,15], so it seems natural to expect an increase in the stiffness degradation with plastic straining. However, the recovery obviously differs from steel to steel.…”
Section: Study Of the Recovery Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strain would not belong to an extra elastic strain but instead to a microplastic strain (e mp ). As discussed in the introduction, e mp is directly related to the dislocation structure, [19][20][21][22] since this extra strain can be produced by mobile or pinned dislocations, depending on the model. As can be derived from Eq.…”
Section: Inelastic Effects On Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (1) shows the calculation of Young's modulus (E), in which the deformation (e) can be divided into elastic (e e ) and plastic or microplastic deformation (e mp ), while s denotes stress. This microplastic deformation results firstly from the short range of motion of mobile dislocations, 19) and secondly from the bowing of the dislocation line between pinning points following models proposed by Mott and Friedel,20,21) and by Granato and Lücke. 22) This extra deformation, which occurs below the internal strength level of the material, is recoverable, and is affected by the dislocation density and the total length of dislocation line that is able to move or bow out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%