2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6031(02)00051-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A physico-geometric approach to the kinetics of solid-state reactions as exemplified by the thermal dehydration and decomposition of inorganic solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent fitting of the kinetic rate data to a nucleation and growth law may result from complex concurrent processes of the surface reaction and established reaction. As is the case of E a , effect of CO 2 higher H 2 O concentration of 8.2 g m −3 , the A value at the higher CO 2 concentration of 0.55 g m −3 is smaller by three orders of magnitude than that at the lower CO 2 concentration of 0.1 g m −3 ; see Table I. As can be seen above, the apparent kinetic behavior and kinetic parameters of the present reaction vary sensitively with very small changes in the reaction atmosphere within the range of the self-generated atmospheric conditions.…”
Section: Kinetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The apparent fitting of the kinetic rate data to a nucleation and growth law may result from complex concurrent processes of the surface reaction and established reaction. As is the case of E a , effect of CO 2 higher H 2 O concentration of 8.2 g m −3 , the A value at the higher CO 2 concentration of 0.55 g m −3 is smaller by three orders of magnitude than that at the lower CO 2 concentration of 0.1 g m −3 ; see Table I. As can be seen above, the apparent kinetic behavior and kinetic parameters of the present reaction vary sensitively with very small changes in the reaction atmosphere within the range of the self-generated atmospheric conditions.…”
Section: Kinetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…5 showed that the activation energy values could easily change by 10 kJ/mol and even more, if some experimental points were excluded, most likely due to particle size dispersion in the measured samples [10]. There can be other factors affecting the reaction rate and thus the acti-vation energy values included the self-heating of reaction interface because of exothermic reaction, changes in water vapour concentration in the reaction interface and the diffusion of water to the reaction interface from the surrounding atmosphere [11,12]. These factors are often considered for dehydration reactions because this type of reactions is well characterized, but the same effects may oppositely influence the hydration reactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction interface was obscured at the later stage by undesirable nuclei, and consequently only the first part of the interfacial movement during the reaction can be evaluated with acceptable accuracy. Figure 4 shows schematically a typical model for the interface advance in a planar geometry [31]. In general, the interface advance involves three processes: (1) breakdown of a reactant constituent by rupture of chemical bonds, (2) structural reorganization of this chemically changed material from the reactant structure (a phase) to the more stable product structure (b phase) and (3) transport of dissociated water molecules through the porous product layer.…”
Section: Microscopy Experiments Of Interface Advancementioning
confidence: 99%