1949
DOI: 10.1080/00045604909352005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Physiognomic Classification of Vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global estimates of direct transformation of ecosystems by humans vary among studies, but there is growing consensus that humans have now transformed ecosystem pattern and process across most of the terrestrial biosphere (Sanderson et al, 2002;Kareiva et al, 2007;Ellis & Ramankutty, 2008). As a result, global patterns of the form and function of terrestrial ecosystems are no longer accurately depicted by the now classic approach to mapping and modelling biomes as a function of climatic and physiographic variables (Shelford, 1932;Holdridge, 1947;Küchler, 1949;Dansereau, 1957;Whittaker, 1970;Prentice et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global estimates of direct transformation of ecosystems by humans vary among studies, but there is growing consensus that humans have now transformed ecosystem pattern and process across most of the terrestrial biosphere (Sanderson et al, 2002;Kareiva et al, 2007;Ellis & Ramankutty, 2008). As a result, global patterns of the form and function of terrestrial ecosystems are no longer accurately depicted by the now classic approach to mapping and modelling biomes as a function of climatic and physiographic variables (Shelford, 1932;Holdridge, 1947;Küchler, 1949;Dansereau, 1957;Whittaker, 1970;Prentice et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the highest level of classification there is the system put forward by Ktichler (1949) and elaborated by Dansereau (1951), which was designed to be of universal application on a world scale and to facilitate valid comparisons between vegetation units in different parts of the world. A local paper (Ross Cochrane 1963) has applied a slightly modified Ktichler system to the description of Australian vegetation types on a continental scale.…”
Section: Classification Terminology and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This physiognomic approach was developed further in the 19th century by Meyen ( 1836), Grisebach ( 1872), Drude ( 1890), and Schimper ( 1898). More recently, DuRietz ( 1932), Dansereau (1951), Kuchler (1949), Fosberg (1%1), and others have improved the physiognomic approach with new innovations. Throughout, the major advantage of methods based on such features as life form and deciduousness has been in the description of large, geographic zones of vegetation, often very similar in appearance, but with substantially different floras.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%