1977
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90377-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A physiologic approach to the problems of simultaneous bilateral neck dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other morbidity from IJVT also must be realized. [13][14][15][16][17] From our experience, this scenario of a thrombosed jugular vein and flap compromise following a neck dissection and free flap reconstruction is rare, probably less than 1% of cases. Certainly, success rates from free flap transfers to the head and neck exceed 90% to 95% in most series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other morbidity from IJVT also must be realized. [13][14][15][16][17] From our experience, this scenario of a thrombosed jugular vein and flap compromise following a neck dissection and free flap reconstruction is rare, probably less than 1% of cases. Certainly, success rates from free flap transfers to the head and neck exceed 90% to 95% in most series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…12 Bilateral jugular vein occlusion, either during the course of a bilateral radical neck dissection or bilateral dissection with preservation and subsequent thrombosis, has been shown to be morbid and potentially fatal. [13][14][15][16][17] Outcomes in those patients whose internal jugular vein becomes compromised can include debilitating facial edema, cerebral edema, blindness, and even death. [13][14][15][16][17] The natural history from a unilateral IJVT is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients with bilateral internal jugular vein occlusion can experience serious complications, such as elevated intracranial pressure, visual impairment, SIADH, and sometimes death. [11][12][13][14] The incidence of internal jugular vein stenosis/occlusion in this study was 21.0%, which is relatively high. These results indicate that particular caution should be exercised to prevent internal jugular vein stenosis or occlusion when performing a bilateral MRND or E-SOHND, and in the case of contralateral neck dissection after removal of one internal jugular vein in a previous radical neck dissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Resection, occlusion, or stenosis of the bilateral internal jugular veins is likely to induce serious complications such as elevated intracranial pressure, facial oedema, visual impairment, and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), and can lead to death. [11][12][13][14] Internal jugular vein thrombosis associated with pulmonary embolism is also a frequent complication 15 and may lead to anastomotic thrombosis in free flap reconstruction. [16][17][18] Risk factors for internal jugular vein occlusion and stenosis include technical problems associated with vessel dissection, such as the method of branch ligation, thermal injury to the vein caused by electrocautery, and dryness after outer membrane detachment, 1,8 and aspects of the reconstructive procedure, including pressure in internal jugular veins in the musculocutaneous flap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%