1964
DOI: 10.1007/bf02908122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phytochemical survey of Malaya Part III. alkaloids and saponins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unlikely that a random screening of the local flora would have resulted in such a high success rate. In several studies the percentage of species identified as alkaloid-bearing is considered higher in ethnobotanical screening than would have been found in a random survey (Arthur and Cheung, 1960;Kiang et al, 1961;Amarasingham et al, 1964;Hultin and Torssell, 1965;Farnsworth, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely that a random screening of the local flora would have resulted in such a high success rate. In several studies the percentage of species identified as alkaloid-bearing is considered higher in ethnobotanical screening than would have been found in a random survey (Arthur and Cheung, 1960;Kiang et al, 1961;Amarasingham et al, 1964;Hultin and Torssell, 1965;Farnsworth, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytochemical analysis was carried out using methanol plant extract using standard methods (Amarsingham et al 1964;Harborne, 1973;Raaman, 2006;Karhikeyan et al 2009). The detailed and systematic pharmacognostic and phytochemical evaluations of Curcuma caesia gives valuable information in order to produce standardized finished herbal products.…”
Section: Screening Of Phytochemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screening was carried out in the Department of Botany of the Gujarat University, Gujarat, India. Preliminary phytochemical screening of plant was done according to the standard procedures adopted by the various workers [11], [1], [12], [6], [14].…”
Section: Preliminary Phytochemical Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%