2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2016.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A piezoelectric impact-induced vibration cantilever energy harvester from speed bump with a low-power power management circuit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average output power of the buck-boost in Case 2 is 271 µW with 82% of converter efficiency but it decreases to 54% in Case 1 due to self-start. In the microwatt scale of the PEH system, converter efficiency in the proposed circuit is relatively higher than the converter in the previous literature [29,30]. It is noted that this section shows the circuit efficiency in the active mode for a given PEH input power, but the efficiency is increased by the increased average PEH power because power consumption of the controller is maintained regardless of the PEH output power [30], and the output power is relatively higher than power consumption of the controller.…”
Section: Circuit Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average output power of the buck-boost in Case 2 is 271 µW with 82% of converter efficiency but it decreases to 54% in Case 1 due to self-start. In the microwatt scale of the PEH system, converter efficiency in the proposed circuit is relatively higher than the converter in the previous literature [29,30]. It is noted that this section shows the circuit efficiency in the active mode for a given PEH input power, but the efficiency is increased by the increased average PEH power because power consumption of the controller is maintained regardless of the PEH output power [30], and the output power is relatively higher than power consumption of the controller.…”
Section: Circuit Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, this topology is only beneficial to energy harvesters that generate low voltage such as electromagnet and thermoelectric energy harvester. Our previous studies designed start-up circuits that are suitable to PEH with the intermittent and random input conditions [29][30][31] in which the controllers autonomously switch between sleep and active modes considering random and intermittent energy. In [29], the impedance matching circuit with sleep mode reduced the power loss using a controller powered by a storage device (e.g., battery) when there is no harvested energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can not only make the fuzzy control algorithm well adapt to the change of the external environment, but also can eliminate the residual error existing in the fuzzy logic control algorithm and thus realize the optimized control of battery charging with constant current and constant voltage. Fuzzy-PI dual-mode control algorithm is a parallel dual-mode control algorithm and its control principle is that when the input error is great, the fuzzy control algorithm with fast adjustment speed is used to control and get better performance in dynamic adjustment [7]. When the input error is small, the PI integral control is adopted, and through eliminating the residual error of the control system as a whole, better steady-state performance can be obtained.…”
Section: Design Of Charge Control Algorithm For Lead Acid Batterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 With regard to the researches initiated by Mouapi A et al, a piezoelectric cantilever beam was placed under the front passenger seat to generate electrical energy, but available vibration displacement was rather limited. 23, 24 Zheng Q et al also attempted to recover vibration energy with the use of piezoelectric cantilever, but since the object was limited to microelectromechanical system, major attention was not paid to the approaches to improve the harvesting efficiency. 22 An energy harvesting system using piezoelectric cantilever was designed, in which the speed bump could be triggered twice in the process of shock compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the size of energy harvested could be affected by the length of vibration time. 23,24 Zheng Q et al also attempted to recover vibration energy with the use of piezoelectric cantilever, but since the object was limited to microelectromechanical system, major attention was not paid to the approaches to improve the harvesting efficiency. 25 Xie and Wang took into full account the effect of road excitation on the acquisition of piezoelectric cantilever beam energy based on a simulation, although the effect of vehicle speed was not mainly elaborated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%