2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot clinical trial on a Variable Automated Speed and Sensing Treadmill (VASST) for hemiparetic gait rehabilitation in stroke patients

Abstract: Introduction: Impairments in walking speed and capacity are common problems after stroke which may benefit from treadmill training. However, standard treadmills, are unable to adapt to the slower walking speeds of stroke survivors and are unable to automate training progression. This study tests a Variable Automated Speed and Sensing Treadmill (VASST) using a standard clinical protocol. VASST is a semi-automated treadmill with multiple sensors and micro controllers, including wireless control to reposition a f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive outcomes of this study lend further support to the findings of a previous study based on an earlier iteration, the VASST I. VASST II permits a wider range of stroke walking abilities to be treated by safe supervised treadmill training safely (31). In spite of similar inclusion and exclusion criteria between VASST I and II devices, key differences between VASST I and VASST II study subjects were shown in their baseline walking abilities; VASST I study subjects had to be able to ambulate at least 150 m with contact guard or supervision (FAC score >4) on level ground at a self-selected walking speed of ≥0.1 m/s with or without walking aids or orthoses in order to be eligible for study participation.…”
Section: Comparative Analyses Of Vasst II and Vasst Isupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The positive outcomes of this study lend further support to the findings of a previous study based on an earlier iteration, the VASST I. VASST II permits a wider range of stroke walking abilities to be treated by safe supervised treadmill training safely (31). In spite of similar inclusion and exclusion criteria between VASST I and II devices, key differences between VASST I and VASST II study subjects were shown in their baseline walking abilities; VASST I study subjects had to be able to ambulate at least 150 m with contact guard or supervision (FAC score >4) on level ground at a self-selected walking speed of ≥0.1 m/s with or without walking aids or orthoses in order to be eligible for study participation.…”
Section: Comparative Analyses Of Vasst II and Vasst Isupporting
confidence: 83%
“…After 12 sessions of treadmill training over 4 weeks, VASST I study subjects experienced significant 428 improvements in the 6 MWT (54.3 ± 30.9 m; P = 0.005), 10 MWT (0.06 ± 0.08 m/s; P = 0.037), and BBS score (2 ± 2; P = 0.005) ( 31 ). These motor gains were sustained up to 4 weeks post-cessation of training (Δ in 6 MWT: 55.9 ± 31.8 m, P = 0.005; Δ in 10 MWT: 0.12 ± 0.1 m/s, P = 0.013; and Δ in BBS score: 2 ± 2, P = 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The virtual therapy exergame study reported that both the intervention and control groups had significant improvements in functional mobility and lower limb strength after the intervention phase, indicating that substituting a portion of the standard physiotherapy time with virtual reality games was equally effective in maintaining physical function outcomes and activities of daily living among community-dwelling stroke survivors (61). The VASST showed significant improvement in walking distance, gait speed, and balance of the stroke survivors (63,65). Compliance with all 12 training sessions was 100% for all subjects, and there were no dropouts or serious adverse events when the VASST was used (65).…”
Section: Conventional and Technology-based Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%