2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot project using a community approach to support child protection services in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, community-based vulnerability and need assessments for child welfare and protection have been well-recognized by the developmental sector [25][26][27]. Another notable study has highlighted the community approach through a pilot project catering to child protection services in China [28]. In the absence of state apparatus, the actors involved in community engagement activities serve as a substitute to care for families with vulnerable children.…”
Section: Vulnerabilities Child Welfare and Institutional Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, community-based vulnerability and need assessments for child welfare and protection have been well-recognized by the developmental sector [25][26][27]. Another notable study has highlighted the community approach through a pilot project catering to child protection services in China [28]. In the absence of state apparatus, the actors involved in community engagement activities serve as a substitute to care for families with vulnerable children.…”
Section: Vulnerabilities Child Welfare and Institutional Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some interventions aiming to promote children's self-recognition (e.g., Spiker & Ricks, 1984), self-efficacy (e.g., Ho et al, 2017), and confidence (e.g., Sahota et al, 2001), respectively, are found to be effective, we find that self-recognition, self-efficacy, and confidence are common predictors that can be malleable in an intervention program. Therefore, this study aims to propose an integrated intervention to enhance KCw/oSPC's self-recognition, self-efficacy, and confidence simultaneously through enhancing their common predictors involving: ability to recognize and accept oneself (Iyer et al, 2017; Lei et al, 2019), success experience (Cameron & Turner, 2016; Ho et al, 2017), good peer relationship (Sidhu et al, 2006; Stainback et al, 1994), and positive self-evaluation (Marston, 1968; Torrado et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three categories of kunjing children: Type I kunjing children live in poverty-stricken families and face challenges in daily life, schooling, and health care; Type II kunjing children have disabilities or severe health problems and suffer from difficulties in receiving medical care and social cohesion; and Type III kunjing children lack safety due to insufficient parental care (The State Council, 2016). In academia and practice, kunjing children are also broadly defined as disadvantaged children who are in great need (Lei et al, 2019). Protecting kunjing children and promoting their well-being are always key emphases in Chinese child welfare policy and practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new collaborative model between government entities and NGOs through the contracting out of social services has also affected foster care services. Pioneer cities with well-established NGOs have launched new child protection programs through government contracts to provide child welfare services (Lei et al, 2019). These new child protection programs aim to establish a mandatory reporting system of child abuse and neglect and to expand the current foster care program to maltreated children.…”
Section: New Contracting Out Social Services Policymentioning
confidence: 99%