2012
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.721047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot randomized controlled trial of an early multidisciplinary model to prevent disability following traumatic injury

Abstract: Early findings point to the value of early screening to identify patients at risk of treatable pain, physical, and psychological impairments. Moreover, early multidisciplinary intervention models following traumatic injury show promise for protecting against the onset of posttraumatic psychological disorders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(112 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to other authors, we found a tendency for less frequent health care use among patients receiving multidisciplinary treatment [37,40]. This finding could be by chance, but the use of other health care services by patients receiving multidisciplinary treatment must be investigated in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar to other authors, we found a tendency for less frequent health care use among patients receiving multidisciplinary treatment [37,40]. This finding could be by chance, but the use of other health care services by patients receiving multidisciplinary treatment must be investigated in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To our knowledge, this study is also the first to utilize the DSM‐5 Criterion A (e.g., patient self‐report of whether the event involved actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence) to screen for a potentially traumatic event among injured patients. To date, one of the standard screening instruments to determine eligibility for early cognitive‐behavioral intervention studies has been satisfying Criterion A of the DSM‐IV PTSD diagnosis . This screening based on DSM‐IV included a subjective assessment of emotions associated with the event (e.g., fear, helplessness, or horror).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model of a therapeutic approach appears protective against the development of PTSD symptoms. Namely, in contrast to the 24% of patients undergoing conventional health care after the injury presenting with PTSD symptoms, none of the patients assigned to a multidisciplinary model had the characteristic symptoms following exposure to trauma 6 months after the injury [10]. Another research indicates that the poor outcome associated with memory, executive functions, attention and information processing speed, are connected with self-reported depression and anxiety after TBI, and adaptive coping strategies have greater influence on the level of depression in individuals with a lower information processing speed [11].…”
Section: Tbimentioning
confidence: 89%
“…One group of studies examined the impact of psychological symptoms early after injury in the further course of the recovery and broader life-social consequences. Thus, a pilot study which included 142 patients with mild to moderate traumatic head injury found that the intensity of acute pain, post-traumatic adjustment, depression and acute trauma symptoms, as well as the use of alcohol, were significant predictors of the severity of pain, depression, post traumatic stress symptoms, as well as physical mobility 6 months after the injury [10]. Early multidisciplinary treatment, which involves pain therapists, physical medicine specialists, psychotherapists, occupational therapists, and clinical psychologists in the first and third months after injury, leads to a significant relief of pain symptoms 6 months later.…”
Section: Tbimentioning
confidence: 99%