“…21,22 As to be expected by assuming such a conservative correlation, there was a general widening of the confidence intervals. In studies where the intervention and comparator group standard deviations were unavailable, the assumed correlation was used to calculate the 6 36 ACBT þ PD, ACBT, Flutter 33% preferred ACBT þ PD, 22% ACBT, 44% flutter Falk et al 1984 29 14 FET, CPT, PEP þ PD, PEP (sitting) 79% preferred PEP (sitting) Patterson et al 2005 38 20 ACBT, Acapella A greater proportion of participants preferred acapella to ACBT but this was not significant (MD 0.4, 95%CI À0.04e0.71) Phillips et al 2004 7 10 ACBT, Hayek oscillator All participants reported that the ACBT was comfortable, 60% reported the Hayek oscillator was uncomfortable, and 80% reported that it was difficult to clear secretions with the Hayek oscillator compared to ACBT Steen et al 1991 31 28 FET, PEP þ PD, PEP (sitting), PEP þ FET 96% of participants chose PEP þ FET as their long term treatment program at the completion of the study Thompson et al 2002 39 17 ACBT, Flutter 65% preferred flutter versus ACBT for long term use Milne & Eales 2004 35 7 ACBT, Flutter 43% preferred ACBT, 29% flutter, 29% no preference Patterson et al 2004 40 20 ACBT, RIM 55% reported that ACBT was more effective, 20% RIM, 25% no preference. 50% preferred ACBT and 50% preferred RIM for home treatment Miller et al 1995 37 18 ACBT, AD 44% preferred ACBT, 50% AD, 6% no preference AD Autogenic drainage, CPT Conventional physiotherapy, PEP Positive expiratory pressure, PD Postural drainage, RIM Resisted inspiratory manoeuvres.…”