2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pilot Study Comparing Two Manual Therapy Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
117
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(79 reference statements)
3
117
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There is preliminary evidence that soft tissue techniques may be beneficial for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome 35,36 and with cervical radiculopathy. 20 Burke et al 35 investigated the effects of two different soft tissue mobilization (STM) techniques designed to address soft tissue restrictions in the forearm and hand of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is preliminary evidence that soft tissue techniques may be beneficial for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome 35,36 and with cervical radiculopathy. 20 Burke et al 35 investigated the effects of two different soft tissue mobilization (STM) techniques designed to address soft tissue restrictions in the forearm and hand of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Burke et al 35 investigated the effects of two different soft tissue mobilization (STM) techniques designed to address soft tissue restrictions in the forearm and hand of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Although clinical improvements were not different between them, both manually applied and instrument assisted STM techniques improved pain, range of motion (ROM), nerve conduction latencies, and function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results suggested that equal improvement in both the IASTM and the control/ massage group. IASTM did not prove to be better than the control groups in these studies 7,8,9,10 .…”
Section: Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…14,27,28 Additional studies have shown clinical efficacy using GT for the treatment of plantar fasciitis, tibialis posterior strain, carpal tunnel syndrome, lumbar compartment syndrome, and trigger thumb. 14,25,[29][30][31] Grade 5 high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation was applied to the talocrural (ankle mortise) joint in an effort to alleviate perceived restriction of dorsiflexion movement as assessed by motion palpation. [32][33][34][35] Glutebridging exercise, squat movement pattern correction, and triplanar gastrocnemius/soleus stretching were integrated into the patient's treatment protocol to promote normal tissue function and flexibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%