ystemic therapy with antiangiogenic treatments targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the current firstline standard of care for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although antiangiogenic therapies can provide significant shortterm clinical benefits, including an enhanced objective response rate (ORR) and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), they typically result in treatment resistance and thus rarely produce durable long-term response or survival. 1 New therapeutic approaches are needed that can provide enduring responses and improve survival in the first-line treatment setting.There is a clear rationale for the use of immunotherapy for RCC. The association between the immune system and RCC has long been known, with an abundance of evidence suggesting that RCC is an immunogenic tumor 2 and is associated with an innate hostmediated immune response. 3 In 1992, the US Food and Drug Administration approved high-dose intravenous interleukin 2 (IL-2) therapy for advanced RCC; this treatment was associated with durable responses and prolonged survival in a small proportion of patients, 4-6 but the toxic effects and the inability to identify which patients are likely to respond have precluded its widespread use.Remarkable progress has been made recently in the clinical application of newer immunotherapies, of which the most notable are immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that increase antitumor immunity by blocking native immune regulators such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1). The anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab was approved, based on results from the CheckMate 025 phase 3 trial, by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2015 for treatment of advanced RCC in patients who have received prior antiangiogenic therapy. 7 However, current evidence indicates that not all patients may find singleagent immunotherapy advantageous, underscoring the unmet need for combination treatment strategies that can improve efficacy in a broader patient population without exacerbating toxic effects.In this review, we discuss the rationale and evidence for using immunotherapy-based combination regimens as first-line treatment of advanced RCC and highlight the associated challenges for practicing physicians.
Discussion
Rationale for Immunotherapy-Based Combination TherapyThe standard approach for combination therapy is to use 2 or more active agents with distinct and complementary mechanisms of IMPORTANCE Novel immunotherapies, notably the immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been shown to be efficacious in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, but innate or adaptive resistance is observed with single-agent immunotherapy. New combination treatment strategies are needed that can improve efficacy in a broader patient population, without exacerbating the toxic effects.OBSERVATIONS Numerous late-phase trials are ongoing to investigate (1) dual immune checkpoint inhibition or (2) combined inhibition of immune checkpoints and vascular endothelial growth factor. Init...