A Pilot Study for Cosmetic Wastewater Treatment Using a Submerged Flat Sheet Membrane Bioreactor

Friha, Inès; Feki, Firas; Karray, Fatma; Sayadi, Sami

doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.584

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, alternative treatment methods including membrane [14], dissolved ozone flotation (DOF) [15], and advanced oxidation processes (AOP), such as Fenton [10,[16][17][18][19], zero-valent Fenton [14,20,21], photo-Fenton [22], TiO 2 [23], or magnetite [24] have been tested. Moreover, biological methods including both aerobic and anaerobic processes were developed [25][26][27][28]. Hybrid processes combining both chemical and biological treatment methods have been also proposed [29][30][31].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Magnetite and Hematite in Advanced Oxidation Processes Application for Cosmetic Wastewater Treatment

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wastewater from a cosmetic factory, with an initial total organic carbon (TOC) of 146.4 mg/L, was treated with Fe2O3/Fe0/H2O2, Fe3O4/Fe0/H2O2, light/Fe2O3/Fe0/H2O2, and light/Fe3O4/Fe0/H2O2 processes. The light-supported processes were more effective than the lightless processes. The fastest TOC removal was observed during the first 15 min of the process. Out of the four tested kinetic models, the best fit was obtained for the modified second-order reaction with respect to the TOC value. The best treatment efficiency was obtained for the light/Fe3O4/Fe0/H2O2 process with 250/750 mg/L Fe3O4/Fe0 reagent doses, a 1:1 hydrogen peroxide to Chemical Oxygen Demand (H2O2/COD) mass ratio, and a 120 min process time. These conditions allowed 75.7% TOC removal to a final TOC of 35.52 mg/L and 90.5% total nitrogen removal to a final content of 4.9 mg/L. The five-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand to Chemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5/COD) ratio was increased slightly from 0.124 to 0.161. Application of Head Space Solid-Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) analysis allows for the detection and identification of 23 compounds contained in the raw wastewater. The identified compounds were eliminated during the applied process. The HS-SPME-GC-MS results confirmed the high efficiency of the treatment processes.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Magnetite and Hematite in Advanced Oxidation Processes Application for Cosmetic Wastewater Treatment

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In order to increase the effectiveness of CW treatment, the possibilities of improving classically used coagulation and DAF processes were investigated [12][13][14][15]. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) [15][16][17][18][19] and the improvement of biological treatment [20][21][22][23] were also tested. Attempts were also made to improve the entire treatment, including both chemical and biological methods [24][25][26].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Magnetite, Hematite and Zero-Valent Iron as Co-Catalysts in Advanced Oxidation Processes Application for Cosmetic Wastewater Treatment

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: There is a need for more effective methods of industrial wastewater treatment. Methods: Cosmetic wastewater was collected and subjected to H2O2/Fe3O4/Fe2O3/Fe0 and UV/H2O2/Fe3O4/Fe2O3/Fe0 process treatment. Results: Total organic carbon (TOC) was decreased from an initial 306.3 to 134.1 mg/L, 56.2% TOC removal, after 120 min of treatment for 1:1 H2O2/COD mass ratio and 500/500/1000 mg/L Fe3O4/Fe2O3/Fe0 catalyst doses. The application chromatographic analysis allowed for the detection and identification of pollutants present in the wastewater. Identified pollutants were removed during the treatment processes. Processes carried out at a pH greater than 3.0 were ineffective. The UV process was more effective than the lightless process. Conclusions: The applied processes are effective methods for wastewater treatment. Chromatographic results confirmed the effectiveness of the treatment method. The kinetics of the process were described by the modified second-order model. On the basis of ANOVA results, the hypothesis regarding the accuracy and reproducibility of the research was confirmed.

show abstract

“…Larger cosmetic factories, that produce a wider group of products, are more representative of the type of cosmetic wastewater generated. The most common and least expensive method used for wastewater treatment is biological treatment (Burek 2008, Friha et al 2012), but also chemical methods are used. (Burek 2008, Wang et al 2008, de Melo et al 2013, Vlyssides et al 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among analyzed solutions, such physicochemical and chemical methods were used: coagulation coupled with sedimentation (Aloui et al 2009, El-Gohary et al 2010, Perdigon-Melon et al 2010, Naumczyk et al 2013, Carpinteyro-Urban et al 2012, coagulation coupled with dissolved air fl otation (DAF) (El-Gohary et al 2010), electrocoagulation (Aloui et al 2009, (Boroski et al 2009), advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) (Wang et al 2008, Aloui et al 2009, Perdigon-Melon et al 2010, Boroski et al 2009, Bautista et al 2007, Bautista et al 2010a, Bautista et al 2010b, Carballa et al 2007, Marcinowski et al 2014, Ebraheim et al 2013). Advanced biological methods were also proposed: membrane reactors (Friha et al 2012, Friha et al 2104, Monsalvo et al 2014), mixed anaerobic-aerobic processes (Zhang et al 2013) or anaerobic reactors (Puyol et al 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cosmetic wastewater treatment using dissolved air flotation

Bogacki

Marcinowski

Naumczyk

et al. 2017

Archives of Environmental Protection

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Five cosmetics wastewater samples were treated by Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) assisted by coagulation. Different aluminum based coagulants were used: (Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 , Al 1019, Al 3010, Al 3030, Al 3035, PAX 16 and PAX 19). The raw wastewater COD values were in the range 285-2124 mg/l. The effi ciency of DAF depended on different coagulants and production profi le of factory. COD removal was varied from 11.1 to 77.7%. The effi ciency of coagulants was similar during treatment of particular sample. The best results were obtained with Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 and for sample 5 -lotions and shampoos production. The wastewater from UV fi lter creams production (sample 4) was resistant to treatment by DAF regardless of used coagulant. HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis can be a confi rmation of DAF effectiveness.Brought to you by | MIT Libraries Authenticated Download Date | 5/10/18 8:40 AM

show abstract

A Pilot Study for Cosmetic Wastewater Treatment Using a Submerged Flat Sheet Membrane Bioreactor

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Magnetite and Hematite in Advanced Oxidation Processes Application for Cosmetic Wastewater Treatment

Magnetite and Hematite in Advanced Oxidation Processes Application for Cosmetic Wastewater Treatment

Magnetite, Hematite and Zero-Valent Iron as Co-Catalysts in Advanced Oxidation Processes Application for Cosmetic Wastewater Treatment

Cosmetic wastewater treatment using dissolved air flotation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About