2020
DOI: 10.1121/10.0001736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot study on the influence of mouth configuration and torso on singing voice directivity

Abstract: Directivity of speech and singing is determined primarily by the morphology of a person, i.e., head size, torso dimensions, posture, and vocal tract. Previous works have suggested from measurements that voice directivity in singing is controlled unintentionally by spectral emphasis in the range of 2–4 kHz. The attempt is made to try to identify to what extent voice directivity is affected by the mouth configuration and the torso. Therefore, simulations, together with measurements that investigate voice directi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, the effect of geometrical details such as the piriform fossae, 1 the vallecula, 2 the inter-dental space, the nasal cavity or more generally the precise 3D vocal-tract shape have been observed to affect resonance frequencies and induce additional resonances and anti-resonances [53], [54]. On the other hand, the higherorder modes have been shown to induce additional resonances and anti-resonances at frequencies above 4-5 kHz [11] and affect speech radiation patterns [12], [16]. Note that side branches can be modelled with TLM, however, to our knowledge, no correction has been proposed to take into account transverse modes.…”
Section: B Limits Of Current Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, the effect of geometrical details such as the piriform fossae, 1 the vallecula, 2 the inter-dental space, the nasal cavity or more generally the precise 3D vocal-tract shape have been observed to affect resonance frequencies and induce additional resonances and anti-resonances [53], [54]. On the other hand, the higherorder modes have been shown to induce additional resonances and anti-resonances at frequencies above 4-5 kHz [11] and affect speech radiation patterns [12], [16]. Note that side branches can be modelled with TLM, however, to our knowledge, no correction has been proposed to take into account transverse modes.…”
Section: B Limits Of Current Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical methods are the analytical model of a piston on a sphere and a measurement-based model generated by fitting circular harmonics on measured directivity data. The KEMAR mouth simulator has been chosen for its detailed anthropomorphic design, a design that is intended to repeatedly reproduce speech recordings which include the near-field self-scattering effects from the head and chest of a human speaker [5]. The loudspeaker has been chosen as a more accessible option due to its widespread use in acoustic measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known for a having a smooth directivity and has a relatively low cost when compared to laboratory mouth simulators. The piston on sphere model (PoS) is a physical model commonly used for studying speech directivity [5,6]. It includes a piston, approximating the mouth source, mounted on a rigid spherical baffle, approximating the head.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations