2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2017.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A plane wave discontinuous Galerkin method with a Dirichlet-to-Neumann boundary condition for the scattering problem in acoustics

Abstract: We consider the numerical solution of an acoustic scattering problem by the Plane Wave Discontinuous Galerkin Method (PWDG) in the exterior of a bounded domain in R 2 . In order to apply the PWDG method, we introduce an artificial boundary to truncate the domain, and we impose a non-local Dirichlet-to-Neumann (DtN) boundary conditions on the artificial curve. To define the method, we introduce new consistent numerical fluxes that incorporate the truncated series of the DtN map. Error estimates with respect to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FEM is a general method for solving mathematical and physical equations. However, the FEM is difficult in dealing with the infinite domain problems and needs several additional technologies [8][9][10]. The BEM is a boundary-type numerical algorithm after the FEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FEM is a general method for solving mathematical and physical equations. However, the FEM is difficult in dealing with the infinite domain problems and needs several additional technologies [8][9][10]. The BEM is a boundary-type numerical algorithm after the FEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, finite element method (FEM) (Brenner et al, 2018) and boundary element method (BEM) (Venas and Kvamsdal, 2020) are the two commonly used methods. The BEM inherently satisfies the Sommerfeld radiation condition for the exterior acoustic problems, whereas some special mathematical treatments need to be incorporated with the FEM to model the infinite exterior acoustic domain, such as perfectly matched layer (PML) (Bunting et al, 2018), infinite elements (Wu and Xiang, 2019), absorbing boundary condition (Jeon, 2018), and Dirichlet to Neumann mapping (Kapita and Monk, 2018). However, the system matrices yielded in the FEM are sparse and symmetric, which can significantly reduce the computation cost and storage requirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this is the best result by far for the preasymptotic error estimate of higher-order FEM. Numerous approaches have emerged over the past two decades to reduce the pollution errors, including hp-FEM [9,40,50,51], CIP-FEM [22,46,47,55,59], discontinuous Galerkin method (DG) [23,24,32,49,58], Trefftz methods [30,31,[34][35][36][37][38]42], and multiscale methods [8,29,52]. In this paper, we would like to introduce the higher-order CIP-FEM which offers significant advantages in reducing pollution errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%