1992
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7225(92)90059-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A plasticity-damage theory for large deformation of solids—I. Theoretical formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Material and process parameters generate a post-processed strain history using FLDs, while the material damage is an approach based on a particular stress or strain field histories acting in a material continuum. Damage is characterized in continuum mechanical models by a specific damage variable evolving until a limit is reached at the onset of crack formation (Lemaitre, 1985;Chow and Wang, 1987;Voyiadjis and Kattan, 1992;Brünig, 2003). Another fundamental difference between these approaches is that during damage development, the microscopic scale is not negligible, so the analysis should permanently be regarded as material dependent and needs to model the microstructure evolution (Garrison and Moody, 1987).…”
Section: Damage and Fracture Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material and process parameters generate a post-processed strain history using FLDs, while the material damage is an approach based on a particular stress or strain field histories acting in a material continuum. Damage is characterized in continuum mechanical models by a specific damage variable evolving until a limit is reached at the onset of crack formation (Lemaitre, 1985;Chow and Wang, 1987;Voyiadjis and Kattan, 1992;Brünig, 2003). Another fundamental difference between these approaches is that during damage development, the microscopic scale is not negligible, so the analysis should permanently be regarded as material dependent and needs to model the microstructure evolution (Garrison and Moody, 1987).…”
Section: Damage and Fracture Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(42) _FEquation (50) is the same with Eq. (19). AMmnkl and AFmnkl are the homogenized damaged elastic concentration factor for matrix and fiber, respectively, and they are determined by the homogenization procedure.…”
Section: The Theory Of Homogenization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local (matrix and fiber) damage tensors are given by Voyiadjis and Kattan as follows [19]: It should be noted that there is no change in the phase volume fractions is assumed in Eq. (19).…”
Section: Anisotropicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis of equivalent elastic energy is used to evaluate M ijkl and establish a relation between the damaged and undamaged stiffnesses [50,51]. The hypothesis, detailed in [52,53], specifically assumes that the elastic complimentary energy W C in a damaged material with the actual stress is equal to that in a hypothetical undamaged material with the fictitious effective stress, i.e.,…”
Section: Homogenization-based Continuum Damage Mechanics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%