A platform approach in solution business: How platform openness can be used to control solution networks

Abstract

This paper explores how customer solution providers leverage digital platform architectures and particularly platform openness to exert control over complex organizational networks. A multiple case-study approach studies three companies with digital platforms that orchestrate solution networks in the LED and ICT industries. Our findings show that the features of product modules (core or peripheral), service modules (relationship intensity and customization), and knowledge modules (explicit, tacit and codified) have differential influence on the levels of platform openness. By managing platform openness of different subsystems accordingly, the solution providers can achieve different control benefits, including ensuring module quality, increasing offering variety, reducing dependence on module providers, and facilitating resource sharing. We contribute to the literature on solution business by reconceptualising the platform approach from a two-level perspective. We also deepen the field's understanding of the role of digital platforms in solution business from an architectural perspective. Recent research in B2B marketing has proposed that solution providers can overcome the challenges of network complexity by adopting a platform approach to network orchestration (Bask, Lipponen,

A Data-Enabled Business Model for a Smart Healthcare Information Service Platform in the Era of Digital Transformation

“…Modularity, as a prominent feature of platform organization, plays a key role in the establishment and governance of platforms [ 22 ]. From the perspective of organizational design, through modular architecture and configuration, a platform dynamically coordinates partners with different resources and different businesses and improves operational efficiency [ 23 ].…”

Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms

“…Scholars predominantly focus on the B2C digital marketplaces at advanced stages with an established pool of complementors and customers (Cennamo, 2019). In the B2B context, a platform sponsor usually develops a proprietary platform with an exclusive set of complementors and customers (Eisenmann, 2008;Rietveld et al, 2019) and gradually opens up to other complementors (Broekhuizen et al, 2021;Cenamor and Frishammar, 2021;Wei et al, 2019). Thus, the emergence of a platform ecosystem in the B2B context gradually unfolds through close collaboration between a platform sponsor, complementors, and customers (Enkel et al, 2020;Granstrand and Holgersson, 2020) as well as competing platforms (Adner et al, 2019).…”

Exploring digital servitization trajectories within product–service–software space

“…Firms leverage modularity (Baldwin and Clark, 2000) to effectively configure product-service-software (PSSw) systems (cf. Cenamor et al, 2017;Rajala et al, 2019;Wei et al, 2019;Saadatmand et al, 2019). For instance, in the shipping industry, PSSw systems may range from simple monitoring services to fully automated shipping systems (Jovanovic et al, 2021).…”