2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A point-of-care cassette test for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cassette is preferable to the dipstick because it is sturdier and its use does not require additional laboratory equipment, and it can also be used on whole blood from a finger prick. Preliminary evaluation of the use of the cassette for whole blood showed that it performed well [ 9 ], but more data are needed to estimate its accuracy. In a previous study evaluating the diagnostic performance of the cassette ICT against sera from various origins (including sera from individuals from endemic areas, individuals with proven infection, individuals with co-infection, and blood donors), the reported sensitivity and specificity were 97% and 94.5%, respectively [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The cassette is preferable to the dipstick because it is sturdier and its use does not require additional laboratory equipment, and it can also be used on whole blood from a finger prick. Preliminary evaluation of the use of the cassette for whole blood showed that it performed well [ 9 ], but more data are needed to estimate its accuracy. In a previous study evaluating the diagnostic performance of the cassette ICT against sera from various origins (including sera from individuals from endemic areas, individuals with proven infection, individuals with co-infection, and blood donors), the reported sensitivity and specificity were 97% and 94.5%, respectively [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary evaluation of the use of the cassette for whole blood showed that it performed well [ 9 ], but more data are needed to estimate its accuracy. In a previous study evaluating the diagnostic performance of the cassette ICT against sera from various origins (including sera from individuals from endemic areas, individuals with proven infection, individuals with co-infection, and blood donors), the reported sensitivity and specificity were 97% and 94.5%, respectively [ 9 ]. Inconsistency between the results of the present study and those of Noordin et al [ 9 ] might be due to the different compositions of the serum panels, which included people of different origins (only sub-Saharan Africans in the former and mostly Asians in the latter study) and the methods used to calculate accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations