2005
DOI: 10.1257/0002828053828464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers

Abstract: Our main goal is to quantify the returns to a career in the United States Congress. We specify a dynamic model of career decisions of a member of Congress and estimate this model using a newly collected dataset. Given estimates of the structural model, we assess reelection probabilities, estimate the effect of congressional experience on private and public sector wages, and quantify the value of a congressional seat. Moreover, we assess how an increase in the congressional wage or the imposition of term limits… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
184
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
184
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, lifting the private-public incompatibility-assumption by allowing for MPs' outside income generation or private-sector capitalization of political experience may lead to equilibria with positive sorting where a wage increase reduces average politician quality. The reason is that a pay-increase in such setting makes public office relatively more interesting to low-skilled citizens (e.g., Diermeier et al 2005;Mattozzi and Merlo 2008;Gagliarducci et al 2010;Keane and Merlo 2010).…”
Section: The Regulation Of Moonlighting: the Ideal Parliament?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, lifting the private-public incompatibility-assumption by allowing for MPs' outside income generation or private-sector capitalization of political experience may lead to equilibria with positive sorting where a wage increase reduces average politician quality. The reason is that a pay-increase in such setting makes public office relatively more interesting to low-skilled citizens (e.g., Diermeier et al 2005;Mattozzi and Merlo 2008;Gagliarducci et al 2010;Keane and Merlo 2010).…”
Section: The Regulation Of Moonlighting: the Ideal Parliament?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 See Diermeier, Keane, and Merlo (2005) for a similar approach in Congress. 9 Note that this is a surprising finding, given that according to the previous literature, voters are very uninformed about judges' decisions in the vast majority of cases (see Gordon and Huber (2007) and references within, and Bonneau and Hall (2006) and references within).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Another estimation technique to account for unobserved heterogeneity is the application of a fixed-effects regression (see Diermeier et al (2005) for an application to US Congress members). However, this would require a panel dataset of MPs, and we have only data for one legislative period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%