2014
DOI: 10.4324/9781315843063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Political History of Western Europe Since 1945

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, policy makers realized early on that the implementation of the ‘Common European Market’ would have far-reaching implications for the governance of migration, as well as for the governance of labor, security, social and environmental protection, and thus for ‘the governance of life and death’ in general (cf. Urwin, 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, policy makers realized early on that the implementation of the ‘Common European Market’ would have far-reaching implications for the governance of migration, as well as for the governance of labor, security, social and environmental protection, and thus for ‘the governance of life and death’ in general (cf. Urwin, 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the level of trade between a pair of states will be influenced by their relationship with interested third-party states. After World War II, the USA ‘had a decisive influence upon West European moves towards closer collaboration and integration’ by facilitating the creation of the European Economic Community (Urwin, 2014: 13). The EEC established free trade zones and later developed into one of the pillars of the EU.…”
Section: Theory: How Indirect Alliances Influence Tradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only does Germany lack any executive powers within the EU, as the complex relations with the Commission or the European Central Bank (ECB) as well as difficult rounds of intergovernmental bargaining illustrate (Schimmelfennig, 2014; Puetter, 2012), but it is also less visibly predominant in “external” affairs, especially when it comes to the area of defense, in which France and the United Kingdom, for instance, appear more prominent. Second, although Schmitt emphasizes the importance of a regional economic space for the establishment of a Großraum , his concept of integration is ultimately political, thus failing to capture the crucial significance of an encompassing economic, legal, cultural, administrative, and technological integration at the core of Europe’s integration after WWII (Urwin, 2014). Thus, despite some features of a soft hegemony in particular policy areas, the complex internal architecture of the EU between intergovernmental politics and collective institutions escapes Schmitt’s Großraum concept.…”
Section: Politics After the State: Carl Schmitt’s Großraum Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%